Utilizing synthetic intelligence is changing into a prerequisite for a lot of jobs, however some firms are rethinking its worth in the case of assessing worker efficiency.
Almost a 12 months after saying Duolingo would consider AI use in efficiency critiques, CEO Luis von Ahn mentioned the corporate has let that metric go.
On April 28, 2025, he introduced that the edtech firm can be “AI-first,” and workers can be assessed on their AI use.
It has sparked a public backlash, and von Ahn instructed the Monetary Instances final 12 months that he “did not expect the blowback” after longtime Duolingo customers commented they had been deleting the app.
In an interview on the Silcon Valley Lady podcast final week, he described the suggestions from workers, saying some started to ask if Duolingo simply wished them to make use of AI for AI’s sake.
“At the end, we backtracked, and we said, ‘No. Look, the most important thing in your performance is that you are doing whatever your job is as well as possible. A lot of times AI can help you with that. But if it can’t, I’m not going to force you to do that,’” von Ahn mentioned.
“It felt like rather than being held accountable for the actual outcome, we’re trying to just push something that in some cases did not fit.”
Von Ahn’s new method diverges from many firms which might be going all in on incentivizing AI worker use. Till just lately, Meta had a leaderboard of the highest 250 AI token customers companywide, an employee-led effort that allowed staff to see how a lot AI their colleagues had been utilizing.
This month, workers at advertising and marketing automation platform Omnisend who’re thought of excellent AI customers can be awarded a 2% to 4% increase. They are going to be evaluated on how a lot money and time their AI use saves; tangible outcomes from their AI workflows; and the way extensively these workflows are adopted.
However a current world survey performed by SAP subsidiary WalkMe discovered that staff are quietly ducking AI use. Greater than a 3rd of workers surveyed skipped utilizing AI on duties as a result of it will cease their workflow or price them extra time.
Along with pushback on how workers are utilizing AI, many workers see the know-how as a direct risk to their jobs and livelihoods. Von Ahn’s AI-first declaration final 12 months mentioned the corporate would change contractors with AI, which raised eyebrows.
Since then, von Ahn has clarified that he doesn’t consider AI will change his workers, however he needs to empower his workers to make use of the know-how.
“The reality is it’s not yet the case that AI is better at coding than humans. I think you still really need engineers, and you’re going to need them for a long time,” he mentioned on the podcast final week.
In his expertise, AI-written code will be troublesome to debug and isn’t constantly dependable when writing tales for Duolingo, von Ahn added.
“Duolingo has used AI for years to personalize learning and expand access. Technology is core to how we build. We’re always learning about what works, and we refine our approach as we go. That includes how we think about AI’s role across our teams,” an organization spokesperson instructed Fortune in a press release. “Our teams’ work depends on human judgment, expertise, and creativity. AI tools assist with that work; they don’t make decisions or replace the people building Duolingo. What drives every decision we make is what’s best for learners.”
