I’m on the spectrum. I’m dyslexic. I’m a CEO. I’m a Senior VP. I’m an actor. I’m fill-in-the-blank. America is the land of labels. And but, because the quantity and depth of the labels we put on have grown, so has our collective disaster of well being — psychological, bodily, and even religious. Our diagnoses, our maladies, our jobs, our titles, our sexual preferences — these are all actual, however they don’t outline us. Or a minimum of, they shouldn’t — as a result of if our labels outline us, we’re additionally confined by our labels. After we reside inside our designations, we shrink the scope of who we will turn out to be. This is without doubt one of the elements fueling the psychological well being disaster, which the truth is factors to a bigger religious disaster.
Neurologist Suzanne O’Sullivan, in her e book The Age of Analysis: How Our Obsession with Medical Labels Is Making Us Sicker, warns that “borderline medical problems are becoming ironclad diagnoses and normal differences are being pathologized,” and “ordinary life experiences, bodily imperfections, sadness, and social anxiety are being subsumed into the category of medical disorder.” The newest Diagnostic and Statistical Guide of Psychological Problems (DSM-5), the so-called bible of psychiatry, lists 297 situations. One in 9 American youngsters has now been recognized with ADHD — 1,000,000 greater than in 2016, with grownup charges doubling up to now decade.
In fact, diagnoses will be life-saving. They may also help construct communities of shared expertiseand allow entry to important therapy. As O’Sullivan noticed in a latest interview, a prognosis “empowers people to be kinder to themselves and to make changes they found difficult before.” However a helpful rationalization is just not an identification.
How tales save and lure us
As Rachel Aviv writes in Strangers to Ourselves: Unsettled Minds and the Tales that Make Us, “There are stories that save us, and stories that trap us.” The hazard comes by means of overidentification. The tales and labels that assist us also can field us in, shrinking our actuality. Or, as Wittgenstein put it: “the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.”
This dynamic goes nicely past medical diagnoses. Certainly, any job or function that totally consumes us can result in what sociologists name “role engulfment.” Research present athletes who middle their identification solely on their sport undergo psychological well being penalties when their roles change or finish. Workers with excessive “work centrality” battle to detach and recharge exterior workplace hours. Workaholism and burnout are intently tied to this slim sense of self. And retirees whose foremost supply of identification was their jobs typically face a painful sense of purposelessness once they depart the workforce.
When your entire identification and sense of self is parked in your job, your entire self rises and falls with the job. I noticed this in motion lately when a pal with a really profitable husband who was depressing at work informed me that she steered he give up. “But who will I be without my job?” he requested. After we can’t think about who we’re with out a given title, we miss the alternatives to develop that lie past the label. The labels turn out to be our ceiling.
You see this play out in American public life, too. It’s exhausting to think about right now that in 1797, George Washington selected to not run once more for President. And it’s notably exhausting after we watch elected officers like Dianne Feinstein, who clung to workplace regardless of her clear cognitive impairments, or Mitch McConnell, who clung to workplace regardless of a collection of well being scares (together with twice freezing on digicam). As retired Senator Tom Harkin suggested his colleagues to ask themselves: “Is this all there is to my life? What am I missing out there?”
Clinging to a single label exacts actual prices. Research present that the extra we outline ourselves by one group or function, the much less tolerant and adaptable we turn out to be — one thing our polarized tradition can ailing afford. Social media multiplies this impact, pushing us into echo chambers that reinforce a restricted sense of self.
After we outline ourselves by our success or our seems to be, failure or growing old turn out to be existential threats. Carl Jung wrote concerning the risks of overidentifying with our personas: “… the professor with his textbook, the tenor with his voice. Then the damage is done.”
Diagnoses and job descriptions inform us what we’ve got or what we do — by no means who we’re. If Teilhard de Chardin was proper, and “we are spiritual beings having a human experience,” then our prospects are limitless. No label, nonetheless authoritative, and no job, nonetheless necessary, can ever include the total constellation of who we’d turn out to be.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
