At the very least two retail prospects pursuing tariff-related refunds have filed proposed class-action lawsuits in U.S. courts towards firms that additionally sued to recoup prices from the import taxes the U.S. Supreme Courtroom dominated President Donald Trump imposed with out the authorized authority to take action.
The federal court docket lawsuits introduced towards supply firm FedEx and French eyewear firm EssilorLuxottica, which makes Ray-Ban sun shades, search to make sure that shoppers get a share of any refunds the companies get. Greater than 1,000 firms, together with massive firms like Revlon and Costco, filed go well with within the U.S. Courtroom of Worldwide Commerce to protect their proper to reimbursement.
On Feb. 20, The Supreme Courtroom invalidated tariffs applied below the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act, or IEEPA, price an estimated $130 billion to $175 billion.
A refund course of both by way of the U.S. Courtroom of Worldwide Commerce or the U.S. Customs and Border Safety is ready to be labored out in coming days or months as a bevy of lawsuits and claims work their approach by way of authorities programs. Firms have been submitting lawsuits protectively to make sure they obtain refunds.
FedEx stated in a press release on Thursday that it might return any tariff refund it’d get to shippers and prospects who had paid them. The grievance filed towards FedEx on Friday by Matthew Reiser of Miami states the corporate’s pledge “creates no legally enforceable obligation and is expressly contingent on future government and court guidance that may never materialize.”
Reiser claims he paid $36 in tariffs and customs brokerage and responsibility development charges on tennis footwear shipped through FedEx by Tennis Warehouse Europe, a web-based retailer based mostly in Schutterwald, Germany.
FedEx didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
In a separate proposed class motion filed this week, Nathan Ward of New York states that he bought Ray-Ban sun shades from ray-ban.com in August 2025 that have been priced larger than previously, reflecting a tariff surcharge.
“Despite seeking an order entitling it to a refund of the duties collected as a result of the subject tariffs, EssilorLuxottica continues to collect and has not refunded the tariff surcharges it collected from consumers,” the grievance states.
EssilorLuxottica additionally didn’t reply to a request for remark.
Barry Appleton, co-director of the Middle for Worldwide Regulation at New York Regulation College, stated he anticipated many extra such shopper lawsuits to floor, particularly towards firms that issued invoices or receipts with itemized tariff costs. The authorized viability of the instances is just not clear-cut however they put strain on companies to share any tax refunds they handle to safe, he stated.
“What we are watching is the predictable next chapter of the IEEPA story,” Appleton stated. “The Supreme Court told the White House it overreached, the major importers lined up for refunds, and now ordinary consumers are asking the obvious question — if those duties were illegal, why shouldn’t we get our money back too?”
