Ohio Congressman Thaddeus Claggett launched a invoice formally prohibiting AI personhood. In some conditions, companies can legally depend as individuals already, so this invoice isn’t essentially associated to AGI.
Claggett’s invoice describes plenty of restrictions: LLM protocols can’t personal property, instantly handle human staff, be held chargeable for against the law, and extra. These “common sense” rules might considerably impression company insurance policies.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Can AI Obtain Personhood?
Synthetic Normal Intelligence, or AGI, is a core long-term objective within the US AI business. Many LLM builders genuinely consider that these fashions can obtain true sentience, functionally turning into unbiased intelligences.
Whether or not or not AI can ever attain personhood like this, one Ohio lawmaker is attempting to preempt the dialogue with a brand new invoice:
New invoice launched in Ohio yesterday would declare AI methods legally “non-sentient”.
HB469 prohibits any AI from being granted “legal personhood”, or being thought-about to have consciousness beneath the legislation.
Fascinating space of legislation creating behind the scenes pic.twitter.com/aLDkZgLnkB
— Julian Fahrer (@Julian__Fahrer) September 24, 2025
If HB 469, launched by Thaddeus Claggett, passes, AI protocols might by no means obtain authorized personhood within the state of Ohio.
This restriction wouldn’t solely concern AGI; within the US, some companies legally depend as individuals for sure enterprise capabilities. Claggett’s invoice takes intention at many of those.
Sponsored
Sponsored
For instance, this invoice would prohibit LLM software program from turning into “any officer, director, or manager” over human beings at any place of business or different group. An AI couldn’t legally maintain or management any property independently, even within the occasion of AI-generated content material.
If a protocol instantly or not directly violates the legislation, a human being should bear felony legal responsibility. In different phrases, these AI personhood restrictions would set up crucially vital precedents for this rising business.
In spite of everything, if a self-driving automobile runs over a pedestrian, it’s not possible to condemn an vehicle to jail. Both the software program builders or different firm representatives would wish to take duty.
Lengthy-Time period Implications: A New Authorized Discipline?
This AI personhood invoice is especially fascinating as a result of Claggett is a Republican. Below Trump’s Presidency, the GOP has turn into a staunchly pro-crypto get together, however some cracks have appeared on this place.
It’s unfair to name this invoice “anti-AI,” however nonetheless, the business usually opposes all regulation. This will likely trigger some friction.
It’s at the moment unclear whether or not this AI personhood invoice will win broader help. Even when it does turn into a legislation, the trouble solely issues one US state. Nonetheless, these are essential “common sense” measures.
Claggett’s efforts right here might kind the idea of future AI regulation throughout the complete nation. If AI improvement goes to be the primary pillar of at this time’s financial system, then we have to reply loads of questions. A brand new area of authorized principle is creating, and now we have the prospect to affect it.
