For greater than twenty years, Emil Michael has operated on the fault line between Silicon Valley ambition and American geopolitical energy, serving to scale one in all tech’s most disruptive corporations earlier than returning to authorities to form how synthetic intelligence can be utilized in battle. The self-proclaimed “one of the best deal guys” has now change into the Pentagon’s most aggressive public combatant in its escalating standoff with Anthropic.
On Friday February 27 the battle appeared to escalate to a boiling level with Trump posting to Reality Social, “I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology. We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!” The submit went on to explain a 6 months section out interval, and unspecified threats to Anthropic ought to it not cooperate.
So far Michael has embraced President Donald Trump’s edicts, together with the demand that the renamed Division of Warfare change into an “AI‑first” group, publicly arguing that whoever strikes quickest on AI will dominate future conflicts. “Speed defines victory in the AI era, and the War Department will match the velocity of America’s AI industry,” he stated in remarks outlining a brand new tech technique that facilities AI alongside hypersonics and directed‑power weapons. “We’re pulling in the best talent, the most cutting‑edge technology, and embedding the top frontier AI models into the workforce—all at a rapid wartime pace.” A Division of Warfare spokesperson underscored to Fortune that Michaels is “leading the mandate to secure U.S. military technological dominance. Emil’s team is moving at unprecedented speed to deliver new advanced capabilities to the warfighter, as reflected in his engagement with hundreds of industry partners during his first nine months as Under Secretary.”
Anthropic was speculated to be the crown jewel of the Pentagon’s AI push. Its Claude mannequin is among the few giant language techniques cleared for sure categorised environments and is already deeply embedded in protection workflows by way of contractors like Palantir. Pulling it out may take months, in keeping with a report by Protection One, making the startup not only a vendor however a essential node within the army’s rising AI infrastructure.
However Anthropic additionally imposed limits that Michael views as basically incompatible with warfighting. The corporate’s inner “Claude Constitution” and contract phrases prohibit makes use of corresponding to mass surveillance of People or totally autonomous deadly techniques—even for presidency prospects. When Michael and different officers sought to renegotiate these phrases as a part of a roughly $200 million protection deal, they insisted Claude be out there for “all lawful purposes.” Michael framed the demand bluntly: “You can’t have an AI company sell AI to the Department of War and [not] let it do Department of War things.”
The battle between the DOW and Anthropic raises two necessary questions: How will the Trump Administration and AI giants work collectively going ahead? And who’s Michaels, the person who’s making choices on behalf of the most important AI buyer on the planet?
Donald Trump tapped Emil Michael in December 2024 to change into undersecretary of protection for analysis and engineering.
WIN MCNAMEE—Getty Photographs
Who’s Emil Michael?
Born in Egypt however raised in the USA, Michael attended Harvard College as an undergraduate and earned a legislation diploma from Stanford. He started his profession with a fast stint at Goldman Sachs, as an affiliate within the communications, media and leisure funding banking group, earlier than leaping into tech at Tellme Networks in 1999, a voice-recognition firm which he helped run earlier than it was acquired by Microsoft in 2007 for roughly $800 million.
His transfer to the startup world was impressed by Clayton Christensen’s “The Innovator’s Dilemma” which argues that market leaders, by nature, are sometimes set as much as fail. “This thesis made me really understand how the technology industry was going to be much bigger, much faster than most thought in the late ’90s,” he advised Authority Journal in 2021. “This made me take the risk of working at my first start-up because I believed that big companies were at risk of being disrupted due to the advent of the internet and mobile phones.”
From there, Michael took a much less standard path than many Silicon Valley executives by shifting into authorities, serving from 2009 to 2011 as a White Home fellow beneath President Barack Obama, serving as particular assistant to then–Protection Secretary Robert Gates on the U.S. Division of Protection the place he managed tasks in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan and oversaw the efforts geared toward decreasing forms to offer assets to troopers.
Michael returned to Silicon Valley the place, following a quick run at social media analytics firm Klout, he joined Uber in 2013 as chief enterprise officer and a detailed lieutenant to CEO Travis Kalanick. Over the subsequent 4 years, he helped orchestrate one of the aggressive expansions in company historical past the place the corporate raised almost $15 billion, and noticed its valuation soar to roughly $70 billion.
Throughout his time at Uber, Michael grew to become a member of Pentagon’s Protection Enterprise Board, an advisory group that shares finest practices from the non-public sector with authorities businesses. On the time of his appointment, he was the one board member with tech startup expertise.
Michael returns to Washington, with a mission on the Division of Warfare
Michael since apologized for each incidents, took a quick detour as a SPAC CEO, however discovered himself again in Washington when Donald Trump tapped him in December 2024 to change into undersecretary of protection for analysis and engineering—successfully the Pentagon’s chief know-how officer. The Senate confirmed him in 2025, putting in a Silicon Valley‑skilled enterprise government on the middle of how the Protection Division thinks about AI, autonomy, and superior weapons techniques.
His portfolio dovetails with Trump‑period efforts to centralize AI governance on the federal degree and prioritize American AI, together with an government order geared toward overriding stricter state guidelines and pushing businesses to categorise and tightly handle “high impact” AI techniques by 2026. Public biographies from the Division of Warfare emphasize his report elevating tens of billions in non-public capital and forging international partnerships as proof he can corral the non-public sector into serving U.S. strategic goals.
In an inner memo reducing the Pentagon’s lengthy listing of precedence applied sciences down to 6, he wrote that the earlier listing “did not provide the focus that the threat environment of today requires,” and declared that “in alignment with President Trump’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) Action Plan, the Department of War must become an ‘AI‑First’ organization.”
When Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei balked on the Pentagon’s calls for, warning the proposed language the DOD wished may enable safeguards to be bypassed, Michael responded by taking the combat public. He accused Amodei of getting a “God complex,” known as him “a liar,” and warned that no non-public firm ought to be capable to dictate the army’s choices. The Pentagon, he insisted, “will ALWAYS follow the law but will not yield to the desires of any profit-driven tech firm.”
Now the standoff has reached a breaking level. Anthropic faces each Trump’s social media directive to wash Anthropic from federal businesses (a requirement it’s unclear if he can implement) and a Friday 5 p.m. Jap deadline to just accept the Pentagon’s phrases or threat shedding its contract fully—a transfer that would power the army to tear out one in all its most superior AI techniques and ship a chilling message throughout Silicon Valley. The 5pm Friday deadline when Congress is just not in session prevents that arm of the federal government intervening in a showdown that AI scholar Gary Marcus wrote “may literally be life or death for all of us.”
For Michael, the battle seems to mirror a perception solid throughout his profession—from Uber’s international growth battles to the Pentagon’s AI buildup—that management over transformative know-how can’t stay in non-public fingers when nationwide safety is at stake. The query now could be how far he’s prepared to go to attain that finish.
