The doc, Charlie Scharf recollects, was 3,162 pages. It included 6,000 duties; 28,000 individuals labored on it. This staggeringly lengthy quantity was the plan to save lots of Wells Fargo, cast by Scharf and his group shortly after he took over as CEO in October 2019.
On the time, Wells had been laboring underneath a regulatory crackdown unleashed by the cataclysm that blackened the previously burnished Wells title, the closely publicized scandal revealing that the financial institution had bilked tens of millions of shoppers by creating faux and unneeded accounts at its branches. That culminated in a draconian penalty imposed by the Federal Reserve: a tough restrict on its whole belongings that primarily blocked Wells from elevating the deposits that kind the lifeblood of banking.
The method was grueling. Scharf recollects that each Monday morning, he would lead a two-hour assembly of the 15-member working committee by which they laboriously labored via the place their departments stood on reaching their targets. “Charlie would go around the table asking, ‘Why are you missing these dates? Why are we falling behind?’” relates one of many mind belief topic to the grillings. He’d relentlessly demand that executives who had been lagging come again subsequent week with a formulation to course right, and catch up. Those that couldn’t sustain didn’t final lengthy.
The duty of saving the establishment seemed past daunting. Traders massive and small took a dim view of its prospects. Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway had been a giant Wells investor for twenty years, slammed the prior prime administration for “ignoring [the sales fiasco] when they found out about it,” and dumped his whole stake. From February 2018 to December 2020, its share value dropped by two-thirds, shaving its market cap from $322 billion to $88 billion. Calls in Congress for a breakup had been rising; Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) demanded that the financial institution break up into models that might extra readily adjust to banking norms, and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) trashed Wells as “too big to manage.”
Scharf admits that as a banker, he’d by no means confronted something remotely as powerful because the mission at Wells. “I remember knowing what I was getting myself into, but it was much worse directionally than I thought … The regulatory pressure was beyond anything I’ve experienced, and so was the political pressure,” the CEO avows. Certainly, introduced in to enact a turnaround, Scharf was going through rising odds that regulators may dismantle one in every of America’s most legendary monetary establishments.
Scharf had been coaching for this job his entire life
Scharf is perched on a sofa in his workplace, framed by floor-to-ceiling home windows overlooking the southward sweep of the Wall Avenue district the place he labored as a young person, the Statue of Liberty a copper-green miniature within the distance. He’s attired in denims and tan sneakers, his quick white hair completely coiffed, sans his regular, nearly trademark owl-lens glasses.
The Wells Fargo rescue job suited Scharf for a primary purpose: He’d been coaching for a activity similar to this one all his working life. He virtually grew up within the Wall Avenue engine room. Scharf’s dad was a stockbroker who ultimately labored for Sandy Weill at Smith Barney, and was nonetheless there when his son grew to become the agency’s CFO in 1995. Beginning at age 13, Charlie throughout the summers would commute along with his father from the household dwelling in Westfield, N.J., a tony suburb 20 minutes west of Newark Airport, to the elder Scharf’s brokerage home. “We’d get off the train at the World Trade Center, and he’d go to his building, and I’d go to mine,” he recollects. The younger Scharf’s numerous posts included such back-office positions as inputting knowledge and dealing within the securities vault.
As a senior at Johns Hopkins College in Baltimore, Scharf began interviewing at prestigious monetary companies in Manhattan when his father really useful an oddball alternative that set his skilled trajectory. “He said, ‘This amazing guy named Sandy Weill has built a great management team at this tiny company called Commercial Credit in Baltimore, and I don’t know what it is, but they’re going to do great things, and you should be with great people.’” His father had a cousin who knew Jamie Dimon’s dad and managed to get Charlie’s résumé to Dimon, the buyer finance purveyor’s CFO.
In the future in March 1987, Scharf spent a day at Industrial Credit score, interviewing with Dimon and several other different executives. “Before I left, Jamie comes to the waiting room and tells me, ‘We’re going to offer you a job.’ I later learned that by hiring me on the spot, he wanted to prove a point, that Commercial Credit was no longer a slow-moving company that hadn’t hired young people for years.” For his half, Dimon remembers that Scharf at the same time as a teen wasn’t straightforward to please. “I kept sending him around to different jobs, and almost everywhere he went he’d come back, and I’d say, ‘How are you doing?’ and he’d say, ‘This area is screwed up, this area is terrible,’ he was always pretty critical. So I said, ‘Okay, kid, you’re going to work for me as my assistant. I want to see what you’ve got.’”
The frat home vibe at Industrial Credit score shocked the inexperienced recruit. “Neither the offices nor Jamie looked like anything out of corporate America,” marvels Scharf. The employees lounged on worn purple velour couches, the fax machine was all the time on the blink, and the AC system was so outdated it hissed loudly, when it cooled in any respect. “People were walking around smoking, it was the era,” says Scott Powell, Wells’ COO and a fellow teen on the agency in these days. Nicknamed “the Kid,” Dimon sported an unruly head of hair that matched his fireball character. Remembers Scharf, Dimon would bark instructions into “a giant, outdated squawk box like the one in Charlie’s Angels.” The Dimon and Weill technique of communication, says Scharf, was to scream at one another till they reached consensus.
A sequence of roles with extra duties adopted—together with following Dimon to Financial institution One in Chicago after his well-known falling out with Weill. Lastly in 2012 Visa got here calling and made Scharf its CEO, a task he excelled at earlier than leaving all of a sudden to, as he says, assist an in depth member of the family navigate a troublesome life journey, including: “When CEOs say they left ‘for personal reasons,’ it usually means they were fired or fooling around. But for me, it really was personal reasons,” he says. “And I’ll never regret it.”
Scharf realized big-time from Dimon’s intensive, super-detailed, hands-on-all-the-levers administration type, but it surely’s his ex-boss’s private qualities that the majority impressed and influenced him. “What I came to realize through the years is that there’s a big difference between being a good manager and a good leader,” he avows. “Being a good leader means you inspire people by what you’re doing and how you do it, how you carry yourself, that they want to follow you into extremely tough jobs simply because they believe in you. That’s Jamie.”
Whereas Dimon is extremely theatrical, Scharf seldom raises his voice in conferences, even when he’s sad. “What he’s really good at is lowering the temperature to find solutions,” says somebody who’s labored with Scharf.
Nonetheless, Scharf’s simply as powerful and blunt as Dimon. “He doesn’t waste time trying to make people feel good when he makes a tough decision. He moved people out quickly, with no anguish,” says somebody who is aware of him effectively. A well-recognized chorus is that he is not going to shrink back from “calling people on their BS.” Don’t search for flexibility when you’re not hitting revenue and efficiency targets, say managers in his orbit. “Charlie is very measured,” says Fernando Rivas, head of company and funding banking at Wells, “but he’s uncompromising on outcomes and values.”
Observes an individual who’s labored with Scharf: “The strange thing about him is, a lot of people are kind and nice on the surface but colder below. Charlie is just the opposite. On the surface he can be intimidating, but go a tiny bit below and you find a sweet, caring person.”
How Wells Fargo misplaced its method
The Wells Fargo he inherited, nonetheless, was a basket case. Having skirted the International Monetary Disaster with its mixture of “Main Street, not Wall Street” fundamentals for on a regular basis Individuals and their companies—actually, Wells tremendously benefited from the meltdown through its emergency buy of failing Wachovia—the financial institution by the shut of 2012 boasted the best market cap of any U.S. megabank.
Then the troubles started.
Put up GFC, regulators needed all banks to tighten up compliance. Prior Wells administration proved completely incapable of instituting the broad infrastructure required to tightly handle threat. “It probably was hubris from avoiding the problems in the GFC,” says COO Powell. A Home Monetary Providers Committee Employees Report from early 2020 reached the identical conclusion, quoting an emergency rent helicoptered in from J.P. Morgan who stated she discovered the controls “immature and inadequate,” and regulators skewered the managers in cost for displaying “no sense of urgency” in fixing them. Wells had traditionally been a extremely decentralized complicated assembled from sundry mergers and acquisitions—administration used the adage “80 horses pulling the stagecoach.”
The chief threat officer was unable to impose unified requirements throughout the fiefdoms. “They were farming out all risk management to individual businesses,” and utilizing handbook processes that had been a decade outdated, says Wells lead director Steve Black. “And they were in quicksand trying to fix it.” The Home report refers back to the then chief threat officer as vainly “attempting to cajole and persuade” the buyer chief to stick to total guidelines, and getting nowhere.
The “fake accounts” catastrophe—by which congressional investigations discovered that Wells deployed a high-pressure tradition of “cross-selling” that rewarded department bankers for opening a number of accounts that clients knew nothing about—value Wells over $8 billion in fines. In its press launch, the Justice Division skewered previous administration for “complete failure of leadership at multiple levels” and the “staggering size, scope and duration of Wells Fargo’s illicit conduct”; 5,000 alleged abusers had been fired from 2011 to 2016. In 2017, regulators compelled the CEO and head of the buyer financial institution to resign, and clawed again a complete of $69 million of their compensation.
Scharf received the arrogance of regulators, partially, by making himself the level particular person at Wells. “We had a formal meeting with all three regulators once a month, but I’d personally call the officials in charge of all three practically every week, often multiple times. I wanted them to see how seriously we were taking this, which was not the case before I arrived. I also wanted to set an example for the other executives, that I’m not going to ask them to spend more time with regulators unless I did it myself.”
To implement the adjustments, Scharf recruited a crack new group who’d put in and labored underneath the sorts of controls Wells wanted. All however two of the working committee’s 15 members are Scharf hires, a lot of whom received his belief earlier in his profession, and the pair on the highest group who labored at Wells when Scharf arrived now fill new roles. A key addition was COO Powell, whom Scharf labored with at Financial institution One and J.P. Morgan, and who’s a seasoned knowledgeable at putting in simply the type of self-discipline Wells wanted. Surprisingly, Scharf named as chief threat officer not an outsider, however a Wells veteran. Derek Flowers caught the CEO’s eye for his knowledgeable work as a credit score threat supervisor in numerous divisions, and he’s confirmed a whiz, says Scharf, on the company CRO job that additionally encompasses operations and compliance. Flowers stories on to Scharf and the board’s threat committee. “The best executives at Wells were not at the top but the mid and upper-mid level, and we promoted many of them, including Derek,” says Scharf. “And that builds confidence with the troops, because they know who the good people are.” Scharf additionally lavished assets on creating the intricate, intensive structure required to fulfill the consent orders, and preserve the brand new superstructure. Right now, Wells spends $2.5 billion extra a yr on threat administration than when Scharf took cost (that’s about 3% of whole bills). Scharf has raised the variety of threat managers stationed in enterprise models by 10,000, an addition that doubled the entire workforce monitoring credit score, operations, and compliance.
For seven years, the ceiling that restricted holdings of deposits and securities to $1.95 trillion compelled Wells to reject gigantic quantities of buyer money. “I’d estimate that we left $600 billion on the table,” reckons Scharf. In that span, J.P. Morgan, Financial institution of America, and Citi have respectively grown their steadiness sheets 58%, 40%, and 34%. In consequence, internet curiosity earnings at Wells, an enormous income line for banks, just about treaded water whereas that metric jumped for its opponents.
However Scharf didn’t stand nonetheless. He developed an overarching technique to develop promising franchises the place Wells had method underinvested. The concept: Elevate price earnings—a class that wasn’t restricted—to offset the decline or flattening in curiosity revenues in massive swaths of the financial institution necessitated by the asset restrict.
Protecting belongings fastened per the caps required some unwelcome maneuvers, explains Rivas, the company and funding banking chief at Wells who lengthy served as Scharf’s prime M&A advisor, and whom the CEO recruited from a prime job at J.P. Morgan. “Asking customers, ‘Will you please take your deposits elsewhere?’ is an unnatural thing for a bank to do,” declares Rivas.
Although Wells had lengthy boasted that “we’re kitchen table, not league tables,” Scharf skilled a highlight on funding banking. Transferring the C-suite from San Francisco to Manhattan helped. Most of all, the industrial financial institution—nearly tied for largest within the nation with J.P. Morgan—was serving scores of firms that wanted recommendation in buying different household firms, for instance, or in elevating recent fairness or debt financing.
Then Scharf skilled his sights on bank cards. “Pre-pandemic, Wells was way off base in the crucial premium credit card space; they weren’t showing any pulse,” says Brian Kelly, founding father of the Factors Man journey web site. One drawback was that Wells had poor fraud detection fashions, so it was regularly turning down transactions it ought to have safely authorised, tremendously annoying particularly rich purchasers, Scharf included. “I was at dinner in London with my wife and friends, and I go to pay, and my card gets rejected,” he recollects. As well as, Wells lacked the experience to grant the high-net-worth crowd sufficiently beneficiant traces of credit score.
Scharf channeled massive investments into the beforehand undernourished division, even green-lighting the comedic advert sequence that includes Steve Martin and Martin Brief, and funding the IT upgrades that solved the credit score traces drawback, in addition to discovering the analytical candy spot for accepting or declining prices. Although there have been stumbles—comparable to a Bilt cobranded card to pay for hire that flopped—even that gave Wells much-needed publicity to Gen Z. From 2020 to 2024 total buy volumes and card balances excellent have each doubled. “Some people would say they’re crazy to compete with Amex and Chase, that have huge technology and interaction,” says Dimon. “But Wells has a competitive advantage, they have a huge client base of over 40 million customers, what I call a ‘warm market,’ so they should.”
In the meantime, Scharf was focusing on deep cuts in spending—in search of out from his earlier expertise locations the place “two layers,” one superfluous and bureaucratic, had been allowed to coexist inside a large company. “We saw it at Citigroup, at the former J.P. Morgan, at Travelers. At Wells, we had extra layers, the same work being done in two businesses that could have been centralized, including HR, legal, IT, and other areas,” he says.
Scharf demanded that every one high-ranking executives have at the least seven direct stories, double the earlier quantity. Wells was swimming in unused actual property. In Minneapolis, Des Moines, and several other different cities, its workforce was usually unfold throughout a number of small and infrequently getting older amenities. From 2019 to the shut of 2024, the financial institution diminished its international footprint from 87 million sq. ft to 60.3 million, and shrank the workplace constructing depend from 650 to 400, by concentrating workers in greater, newer places. When Scharf arrived, Wells had three-quarters of J.P. Morgan’s revenues however 6% extra workers. Beneath Scharf, Wells’ headcount has declined by nearly 25% to 210,000. He consciously downshifted in areas comparable to dwelling loans, which grew to become much less worthwhile given larger capital necessities following the GFC, and held “reputational risk” he didn’t need ought to foreclosures spike.
Going ahead, Scharf’s holy grail is return on tangible frequent fairness or ROTCE, primarily the cents an enterprise offers shareholders for each greenback they make investments. Final yr, Wells hit 13.4%. That determine waxed Citigroup (7%), just about tied BofA, and fell effectively in need of J.P. Morgan’s 20%. A number of years in the past, Scharf set a purpose of 15% that then seemed extremely aspirational. However he’s nearly there, hitting 14.4% on common for the primary two quarters of 2025. For Scharf, getting to fifteen% is only a method station. He’s aiming to cost towards the industry-topping, J.P. Morgan–type summit.
That’s to not say the job is completed. John McDonald, an analyst at Truist Securities, likens Wells’ subsequent act to this: “Wells had to lose weight, and Charlie got them on a diet. Now they’re at the gym and need to build muscle.”
Scharf has taken the inventory from $52 when he began to $81 as of early October. Together with robust dividends, Wells generated a 11.1% annual return since he took cost six years in the past, effectively beneath J.P. Morgan’s 198.7% however virtually matching BofA (11.2%) and beating Citi (9.2%), and a beat on the KBW Financial institution Index at 10.0%.
“If you look at where Wells was when he arrived and where it is now, not many people could have done what he did,” says Frank Bisignano, a colleague from J.P. Morgan and former CEO of funds colossus Fiserv who’s now commissioner of the Social Safety Administration and chief govt officer of the IRS. “He was brave to take the job. You look at great coaches, they bring their coaching staffs with them. That’s what Charlie did at Wells, and it’s a sign of great leadership.”
Free of the worst days of the Wells saga, Scharf is palpably grateful for the moments he has along with his household, his daughter’s upcoming wedding ceremony, the weekends on Lengthy Island in Remsenburg, a bayfront village effectively west of the Hamptons glamour zone, the place he seldom runs into opponents and workers on the hotspots. He unwinds by training woodworking in his store on the property, an exercise he finds “soothing.” He prides himself on fashioning raised moldings and customized bookshelves. Dimon jokes that Scharf’s most likely the one company chieftain who unwinds in a woodshop.
However his outdated mentor Dimon has excessive reward for the job Scharf has completed. “The world is his oyster now that the asset cap is lifted and Wells can once again focus on growth. Charlie did an excellent job,” says this famend truth-teller. However Dimon can’t resist including one closing little bit of roasting for his buddy and protégé of 30-plus years. “Though,” he says with a smile, “I probably would have wanted to do it faster.” Six thousand duties later, Charlie Scharf did it on his personal timeline. And the stagecoach is rolling once more.
