A lot of Google’s AI rivals may have been upset to see the tech large escape largely unscathed from its first main antitrust battle with the U.S. authorities. Regardless of concluding Google had operated an unlawful monopoly, U.S. district decide Amit Mehta didn’t drive the corporate to take treatments similar to spinning off its Chrome browser or to cease paying {hardware} distributors for prime positioning on their platform. Nor did the decide say Google should give customers specific “choice screens” that would have inspired them to make AI rivals like ChatGPT or Perplexity their default search choice.
However Mehta did order Google to undertake one measure that could possibly be a serious win for its rivals: The decide ordered the tech large to share its search index, together with sure consumer knowledge, with opponents. Appeals by Google and the Justice Division may imply it might take years for the treatment to take impact however, if it goes ahead, the order may shake up the aggressive panorama for AI.
Google’s crown jewel
In reality, OpenAI approached Google in 2024 a couple of partnership that might have seen the search large share its search index with the AI firm to energy searches inside ChatGPT, however Google rejected the thought, in response to proof introduced through the antitrust trial.
Turning to Bing, or constructing from scratch
As a result of Google has to this point refused to make its search index out there, most AI distributors, similar to OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Perplexity, have been compelled to look elsewhere. Many have turned to Microsoft, which does enable different firms to pay to make use of the search index that powers its Bing search engine. However Bing, as a result of it solely has about 4% marketshare in search, sees many fewer queries than Google does, and its search index shouldn’t be thought of to be as correct, particularly for these much less widespread queries.
Forcing Google to offer rivals a leg up
If Choose Mehta’s ruling stands, the trail for these AI rivals to match Google’s search efficiency may have gotten considerably simpler. That’s as a result of Mehta informed Google it must share its search index with others “at marginal cost.”
Google is just required to share a one-time snap-shot of the index, not enable continuous entry to it, as Bing does with its API. Mehta particularly rejected the thought of ongoing entry as a result of he mentioned he desires individuals to construct rival search indexes and was nervous that if opponents had continuous entry to Google’s they’d develop into “free riders,” and never construct their very own. However even having that snap-shot may give opponents a serious leg up in matching Google’s efficiency.
Mehta additionally dominated that Google might want to share sure key knowledge on how customers work together with search outcomes. This consists of data similar to the place the consumer is positioned, what sort of gadget they’re utilizing, which hyperlinks they clicked on, and which hyperlinks they hovered over and for the way lengthy. The decide mentioned Google would want to show over this knowledge to opponents “at least twice” through the five-year interval throughout which the courtroom’s ordered treatments would apply. Once more, this data may assist AI firms get nearer to constructing Google-level search indices.
Ultimately, each elements of the antitrust ruling may wind up saving the AI firms important money and time. So at the least there’s some silver lining for Google’s AI opponents, in what was in any other case a dismal day for these hoping to finish Google’s dominance as the first manner individuals discover data digitally.
Fortune World Discussion board returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and international leaders will collect for a dynamic, invitation-only occasion shaping the way forward for enterprise. Apply for an invite.
