Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk has constructed Tesla right into a trillion-dollar powerhouse by making massive guarantees.
Generally, these guarantees have come to fruition (like Tesla’s finances Mannequin 3 or the Robotaxi), however many different occasions, they haven’t.
Musk’s lofty guarantees have been tied to Tesla’s Robotaxi and its superior driver help programs program.
Again in 2016, Musk even mentioned that Tesla ADAS would have the ability to drive cross-country with out human intervention by 2017.
Extra not too long ago, Musk has switched his FSD push into overdrive, publicly selling what Tesla’s outfitted with the newest full self-driving expertise can do.
In March, tweeted: “FSD beta build V8.1 normally drives me around with no interventions. Next version is a big step change beyond that. Tesla is solving a major part of real-world AI. This is not widely known.”
Associated: Tesla Robotaxi fails miserably in Cathie Wooden road check
Tesla fanatics and shareholders fail Elon Musk’s cross-country journey check
This week, a pair of Tesla shareholder-influencers got down to show one among Elon Musk’s lofty proclamations true once they got down to drive cross-country with FSD taking management the entire journey.
Bearded Tesla Man recorded a video for his almost 100,000 YouTube subscribers, trying to drive his model new Tesla Mannequin Y Juniper cross-country from San Diego, California, to Orlando, Florida, with FSD V13 navigating the whole method with out human intervention.
Nevertheless, BTG by no means accomplished the 35-hour, 2,431-mile journey. Actually, the automotive by no means made it out of California.
Ten seconds into the second a part of his video, BTG and his passenger see what they assume is roadkill on the street in entrance of them. Sadly, Tesla FSD would not see the item (a chunk of steel) and runs over it, going 76 miles per hour.
The influence causes the entrance of the car to go airborne and forces the pair to drag over to the facet of the street. The influence broke a sway bar bracket and broken suspension elements.
Each car occupants noticed the simply seen particles within the street in ample time to keep away from it, however Tesla FSD didn’t.
Commenters react to Tesla FSD crash video
Commenter @zimbabeast appeared involved about what the crash says about FSD’s present capabilities.
“This is bad. FSD should have at least slowed down and perhaps treat it as a speed bump. It was a decent-sized metal ramp. It airlifted a heavy Model Y. Tesla needs to see this video!”
Bearded Tesla Man responded to his remark, saying, “I was surprised FSD didn’t do anything at all. Still was on me for letting it happen.”
Associated: Tesla faces one other lawsuit after $323 million Autopilot verdict
Consumer @Weezedog took concern with what the Tesla drivers informed the CHP officer who assisted the 2 on the facet of the street. “Tells the cop, ‘There was no time to avoid it’, when you literally were talking about the object on camera for 8 seconds before hitting it. Blind faith in Elon leading the blind. This is like the who people who drive into a lake because their GPS told them to.”
Bearded Tesla Man acknowledges that FSD V13 is a supervised ADAS system and that the automotive isn’t designed to function with out human supervision, even when Musk promised that it could have the ability to just do that just about a decade in the past.
Tesla shareholders sue firm over Robotaxi claims
Some Tesla shareholders, like Cathie Wooden, are agency believers, that FSD is the long run tech that can make Tesla probably the most helpful firm on the earth by the tip of the last decade.
“Our target in five years is $2,600, and our confidence in that number has gone up now that Tesla is commercializing Robotaxis in August and June,” Wooden mentioned not too long ago.
Nevertheless, a gaggle of shareholders not too long ago sued Tesla and CEO Elon Musk as a result of the corporate wasn’t utterly trustworthy concerning the issues with Robotaxi.
The category motion go well with covers defendants who bought Tesla shares between April 19, 2023, and June 22, 2025. The defendants are in search of damages for unkept guarantees.
Particularly, the lawsuit alleges:
“Tesla overstated the effectiveness of its autonomous driving technology; (ii) there was thus a significant risk that the Company’s autonomous driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, would operate dangerously and/or in violation of traffic laws; (iii) the foregoing increased the likelihood that Tesla would become subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny; (iv) accordingly, Tesla’s business and/or financial prospects were overstated; and (v) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.”
Associated: Tesla takes drastic motion to keep away from one other $243 million Autopilot settlement
