The Tesla board has managed to keep away from what may have been a tough investor vote on requiring political neutrality amongst executives, after the Securities and Alternate Fee dominated the electrical automobile producer may exclude a shareholder proposal on the matter from its 2025 annual supplies, based on a duplicate of the SEC’s letter obtained by Fortune.
The proposal was submitted by Jay Butera, 67, a staunch local weather advocate and investor who has held shares in Tesla because the firm’s 2010 IPO. Butera’s neutrality proposal, if authorised by shareholders, would have prohibited Tesla management from making political statements, endorsements, or contributions in help or opposition to political events or candidates. Butera, a retired entrepreneur who nonetheless holds thousands and thousands of {dollars}’ price of Tesla inventory, is a die-hard renewable vitality supporter and beforehand lobbied for the creation of the bipartisan Local weather Options Caucus within the Home of Representatives in 2016.
Butera mentioned he’s dissatisfied within the end result as a result of he thinks the proposal would have helped Tesla advance its “mission of accelerating sustainability,” which he views as important to the world. He informed Fortune he doesn’t wish to see the corporate “jeopardized by unnecessary forays into the endless friction of human politics. The Tesla brand, and its mission, should stay above that fray.”
The Tesla board in August despatched a letter to the SEC in search of to exclude the proposal from its 2025 proxy supplies with out risking an enforcement motion from regulators. Like most publicly traded corporations, the $1.3 trillion EV and robotics firm sends proxy supplies to Tesla shareholders prematurely of its annual conferences every year. Excluding the proposal means buyers gained’t get an opportunity to vote on it on the upcoming assembly in November.
Nevertheless, some Tesla buyers have been hoping for the board to extra immediately deal with the difficulty. Retail, particular person buyers who maintain 1000’s of shares within the firm have submitted and upvoted questions associated to CEO Elon Musk’s function in politics—and his time spent on issues pertaining to Tesla—on shareholder platforms Tesla makes use of to solicit queries earlier than quarterly earnings calls each quarter since late 2024. Butera’s proposal would have been the primary time buyers had an opportunity to vote immediately on the difficulty of politics and their influence on the EV maker’s enterprise.
Whereas the proposal doesn’t explicitly point out Musk, the Tesla CEO has been closely concerned in conservative Republican political exercise since he donated thousands and thousands to a Tremendous PAC dedicated to advancing President Trump’s 2024 marketing campaign. After the election, Musk grew to become a fixture at Trump’s aspect within the Oval Workplace and at Mar-a-Lago, and served as a visible emblem of the Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE), regularly showing in black DOGE baseball caps. The friendship crescendoed right into a thunderous fallout in June, when a feud between Musk and Trump performed out on their respective social media platforms, X and Reality Social. Since then, the 2 have seemingly severed ties.
The Tesla board argued in its letter to the SEC that the proposal sought to “micromanage” the corporate and that Tesla itself lacks the facility or authority to implement such a measure. In its reply, the fee agreed that the proposal was micromanagement and informed Tesla it will not suggest any enforcement motion if the board omitted it from its proxy supplies. It didn’t touch upon the second prong of the board’s argument to exclude the proposal.
“In reaching this position, we have not found it necessary to address the alternative basis for omission upon which the Company relies,” the SEC’s overview staff wrote in a letter to Xuehui Cassie Zhang. Zhang is the affiliate normal counsel at Tesla.
Tesla didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
“Calling the proposal ‘micro-management’ seems ironic because my proposal was trying to address a nearly existential problem for the company,” Butera mentioned. “Hopefully it at least gives pause for management and the board and encourages them to seek their own solutions to the problem.”
Tesla’s board informed buyers in preliminary proxy supplies that implementing the tenets of the proposed coverage may require the corporate “to violate state laws, including those that limit the ability of a company to regulate the political speech of their employees.” The board included that suggestion in pre-proxy supplies previous to the SEC’s issuance of its letter. A definitive proxy will quickly be distributed to buyers and filed publicly.
Butera beforehand informed Fortune he submitted the proposal after sending a letter to the board in October 2024 outlining his issues and never getting a response.
Tesla’s present Code of Enterprise Ethics asks workers to keep away from conflicts of curiosity that conflicts “may arise whenever your personal interests interfere, or appear to interfere, with Tesla’s interests,” it states. The code applies to all administrators and workers of Tesla and states the “CEO, and all senior financial officers, including the CFO and principal accounting officer, are bound by the provisions set forth therein relating to ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with applicable laws.”
Fortune International Discussion board returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and international leaders will collect for a dynamic, invitation-only occasion shaping the way forward for enterprise. Apply for an invite.
