Because the prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket dominate the eye of traders and regulators, a sports-focused challenger known as Novig is asserting $75 million in contemporary funding to compete with the dual giants. Led by the blockchain enterprise agency Pantera Capital, Novig’s Sequence B spherical values the startup at $500 million.
As soon as a extremely restricted pastime, sports activities betting has in recent times seeped into each nook of the U.S. economic system. First got here a 2018 Supreme Court docket determination that paved a path for states to legalize playing on leagues similar to soccer, basketball, and baseball. Then, a 2024 courtroom victory by Kalshi broadened the sorts of contracts that prediction markets may supply, main platforms to maneuver past providing bets on climate and award present outcomes, and into fields like elections and sports activities.
At the moment, the overwhelming majority of Kalshi’s quantity comes from sports activities contracts, whilst some state governments are looking for to restrict or shut down sports-based prediction markets. Novig, although, is focusing much less on the authorized dimensions and taking on a special argument with regards to sports activities betting: that the prevailing choices rip off their customers.
“We started the company because we felt sports betting was broken,” cofounder Jacob Fortinsky informed Fortune. “Our mission from day one was to build a platform really built for modern sports bettors in the most consumer-friendly, the most engaging, and the most profitable way possible.”
Playing on the long run
Fortinsky began engaged on Novig in 2021 throughout his senior yr at Harvard together with his cofounder Kelechi Ukah, coming into the tech incubator Y Combinator the next yr. Throughout this time, nevertheless, the regulatory outlook for prediction markets was cloudy at finest. (Polymarket could be banned from the U.S. in 2022 for providing unlicensed betting.)
Novig initially registered as a regulated sports activities betting operator in Colorado earlier than switching to a sweepstakes mannequin. Nonetheless, neither strategy allowed Novig to function nationally, and the latter led to authorized challenges from state regulators. Now, Novig is making use of to function beneath the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee, which Fortinsky hopes will likely be accomplished inside six months.
His argument for why Novig’s prediction market is superior to conventional sportsbooks like FanDuel is straightforward: As a result of Novig is peer-to-peer, customers aren’t buying and selling towards the home, and theoretically are getting higher odds. Why Novig is healthier than Kalshi, which boasts considerably extra quantity, is much less clear, however Novig makes the case that the charges on the platform makes it prohibitively costly.
Novig, in distinction, is commission-free for retail merchants, therefore its title—a play on the time period “vig,” or the rake that sportsbooks take. As a substitute, the platform costs charges to institutional contributors on the platform. That implies that customers are sometimes betting towards so-called “smart money,” although Fortinsky says {that a} (still-depressing) 20% of Novig bettors are prone to be worthwhile, which he claims is far larger than different platforms.
On a extra elementary degree, Fortinsky says that Novig was constructed for sports activities, versus Kalshi and Polymarket, which initially emphasised different sorts of contracts. “Our basic bet as a company is that the median sports fan is far more likely to use an app whose brand and whose product is really built with sports in mind, rather than with crypto or war in South America,” Fortinsky mentioned.
Whether or not the proliferation of sports activities betting by prediction markets is wholesome for sports activities followers is a separate query. Whereas critics—and states—have argued that prediction markets are simply one other type of playing, Fortinsky pushed again. “Ultimately financial trading and betting are sort of converging,” he mentioned. “In a colloquial sense, we certainly don’t view what we’re doing as gambling.”
Although the excellence could seem skinny, even CFTC chair Michael Selig appears to agree, arguing in a Wall Avenue Journal op-ed final weekend that event-contract markets squarely match beneath the remit of his company and “serve legitimate economic functions.”
For Fortinsky, sports activities betting is simply a part of the fandom expertise, regardless of the blurred moral traces concerning athlete and league participation. “For many sports fans, it deepens their engagement, deepens their enjoyment and their fan experience,” he mentioned. “A lot of the frustration with sports betting is really that it’s a commoditized product that is basically dominated by these casinos that are trying to make as much money as possible at the expense of sports fans.”
