In keeping with Technique founder Michael Saylor, quantum computing received’t break the Bitcoin community. As an alternative, the blockchain will merely “upgrade” in a tough fork.
This backwards-incompatible “upgrade,” he posted to X, will freeze quantum-vulnerable pay to public key (P2PK) outputs and provide extra bonuses of a diminished provide of bitcoin (BTC), greater safety, and a stronger community.
It might forestall Satoshi Nakamoto from spending his cash, and pressure a migration of nodes and miners to backwards-incompatible software program.
The Bitcoin Quantum Leap: Quantum computing received’t break Bitcoin—it’s going to harden it. The community upgrades, lively cash migrate, misplaced cash keep frozen. Safety goes up. Provide comes down. Bitcoin grows stronger.
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) December 16, 2025
Michael Saylor needs to change BTC’s provide for quantum safety
“Looks like Saylor supports freezing Satoshi’s coins if quantum computers materialize,” somebody commented. “Lost coins do not stay frozen, they get stolen,” clarified one other.
“It’s so easy to call for freezing property when the property is not yours,” wrote one other, whereas one developer claimed, “Every single thing you mentioned here is extremely complex with colossal risk and externalities.”
Reactions to the proposal have been so damaging that some even clung to the hope that the put up was AI generated.
The specter of quantum computer systems forging BTC signatures is actual, albeit years if not many years sooner or later.
As soon as massive, fault‑tolerant machines operating Shor’s algorithm break an ECDSA logarithmic drawback, that quantum laptop may derive the personal key from sure P2PK public keys.
These embrace unspent transaction outputs belonging to Satoshi and Hal Finney from the earliest days of the Bitcoin ledger.
From then on, that non-public key could signal any transaction and spend all the BTC in its pockets.
