Netflix’s $72 billion play for Warner Bros. is as a lot a guess on the way forward for synthetic intelligence (AI) and chips as it’s on motion pictures and exhibits, based on a prime Wall Avenue analyst, who stated in an interview with Fortune the deal can’t be understood with out Google’s expertise ambitions.
Amid cries from the jilted Ellison household a couple of “tainted” sale course of and indie producers and theater homeowners of the “death of Hollywood,” Melissa Otto, Head of Analysis at S&P World Seen Alpha, sees a special recreation being performed. Otto stated she thinks the tech angle of the business is being ignored.
“I think there’s this much bigger conversation that is being missed,” she stated: Google and its TPU chips.
A key query for the way forward for leisure, Otto advised Fortune, is management over premium video at large scale in an period when generative AI will more and more create, remix, and personalize shifting photographs. (Otto known as it the “video corpus” that can prepare and energy the following technology of AI fashions.) Over the long run, Otto added, that may be a key a part of the thriller behind why Netflix, lengthy a builder quite than a purchaser, would make Hollywood historical past by taking out one in every of its largest rivals and one of many city’s status legacy studios.
Co-CEO Greg Peters was requested a blunt query about that very same factor this morning on the decision with analysts concerning the historic merger. Wealthy Greenfield of LightShed Companions cited Peters’ personal earlier assertion at a Bloomberg convention about how there’s a protracted historical past of failed media mega-mergers, so he questioned: “Why is this going to end differently than every other media transaction essentially of this scale and history?”
Peters, whereas clarifying his remarks on the convention have been a bit extra nuanced, acknowledged “historically, many of these mergers haven’t worked, some have, but you really got to take a look at this on a case by case basis.” Nonetheless, Peters argued most earlier massive offers confirmed a lack of expertise concerning the underlying enterprise, and Netflix understands these property and has a “clear thesis about how the critical parts of Warner Brothers accelerate our progress.” He additionally acknowledged Netflix isn’t professional at doing large-scale M&A.
In any case, that is costly. “We are surprised that Netflix felt the need to spend $80bn+ and pay a premium for something Netflix disrupted,” Barclays analysts wrote in response to the deal, “and it is not clear what problem or opportunity Netflix is solving for that couldn’t have been achieved organically.”
“While the WBD assets bring an amazing amount of attractive content, NFLX is paying a steep EBITDA multiple of more than 25x, which seems extravagant,” Novosel wrote. As soon as it reaches the marketed synergies, he added, the ensuing a number of of nearer to 15x appears extra affordable. Whereas these are pending, “the huge amount of debt that Netflix will need to raise to fund the deal will take leverage to well more than 4x initially.” Novosel wrote traders might have to be affected person. Bloomberg’s credit score group, in the meantime, reported the $59 billion bridge mortgage being taken out to finance this deal is among the many largest in company historical past.
Right here’s what Otto sees occurring in Northern California, removed from Tinseltown, the place the Warner deal is all anyone can discuss, and why Netflix took such an enormous swing.
Is the way forward for leisure Northern or Southern California?
A part of Netflix’s thesis, based on Otto, is that it’s a tech firm at coronary heart and it acknowledges Google’s speedy developments in AI, notably its developments in TPU chips.
“What TPU chips do really, really well is in the modality of video in generative AI,” Otto stated, as they basically flip mathematical representations into shifting footage in a lot the identical manner GPUs revolutionized pure language AI by tokenizing and modeling textual content. As a substitute of ChatGPT and textual content, suppose Gemini 3 and YouTube movies.
Netflix already trails YouTube in whole share of streaming time, with Financial institution of America Analysis just lately citing Nielsen knowledge exhibiting YouTube held 28% of U.S. streaming, versus Netflix’s 18%. Otto stated this threatens to go up one other notch when and if Google’s TPU chips turbocharge content material made with generative AI.
“I’m sure that it’s feeding into the strategy,” Otto stated. “If I were Netflix and I knew that Google, one of their formidable competitors, had this chip technology and was essentially plowing billions and billions of dollars into developing the infrastructure so that they could carve out the corpus of the video modality in generative AI, I would want to build a moat around my business.”
On the floor, Netflix is shopping for a legacy studio with a deep library, beloved franchises, and a world model—and paying as much as do it. The mixed streaming and studio enterprise generates about $25 billion in income and roughly $4 billion to $5 billion in EBITDA, however margins on streaming stay skinny, making the economics of the deal look robust within the close to time period. Executives have emphasised overlapping subscribers, apparent value cuts and an anticipated $5.5 billion in efficiencies, the type of “low‑hanging fruit” that may occupy administration for the following 12 to 24 months, Otto stated.
However in a world the place TPUs could make excessive‑high quality video “basically for free,” any participant missing each the chips and the content material might discover itself outgunned as AI reshapes how leisure is produced and consumed. That makes Netflix’s massive splash for Batman, Harry Potter, and the like a special type of moat, and a special type of recreation than the basic Hollywood rivalries of yore. Otto stated it was believable generative AI leisure may very well be seen as an extension of the latest IP wars that noticed Hollywood deluged by floods of superhero motion pictures and sequels, with Disney’s Marvel Studios ushering in a pc generated revolution within the twenty first century. “I think that’s not an outrageous assumption.”
By absorbing Warner Bros., Netflix will increase the amount and variety of content material it could possibly feed into suggestion programs, experimentation and, ultimately, its personal AI‑pushed video instruments. Otto additionally famous the deal doubtlessly offers Netflix extra publicity to promoting, an space through which Alphabet has dominated and the place Warner Bros. nonetheless generates $6 billion–$7 billion in advert income. Whereas the final word vacation spot of that advert expertise stays unclear, as they might go to the spinco that features WBD’s cable property similar to CNN and TNT. (Netflix has solely been lively in advertisements since 2022, having been a premium subscription service because it pivoted from DVD leases to streaming within the late 2000s.)
Think about a world, Otto stated, the place you could possibly create your individual variations of the crime basic Columbo starring an AI-generated model of legendary actor Peter Falk, who died in 2011. (Columbo had a number of properties on TV on neither Warner Bros. nor Netflix, because it was first an NBC property within the Seventies, after which an ABC property from the late ’80s onward.) “In this day and age, boy, wouldn’t it be interesting?” Otto requested rhetorically.
In some ways, she added, this second is exceptional as a result of Netflix might find yourself neither a subscription nor an promoting enterprise, however an AI-based one which doesn’t fairly exist but. “It’s kind of exciting because it means that it’s anybody’s game,” Otto stated.
Otto additionally raised the spectre of TikTok, the social media large partially beneath the management of Larry Ellison.
“They’re a formidable competitor as well,” she stated. What’s doubtless, she added, is the longer term shall be unpredictable. The rise of AI “could provide some really amazing innovation over the next couple of years.” She agreed it might create a bonanza for present enterprise legal professionals who wrangle over the rights of issues just like the likeness of Falk, which was a serious difficulty within the latest Hollywood strikes.
“That may be the real story,” she stated.
[Disclosure: The author worked internally at Netflix from June 2024 through July 2025.]
