Talking at Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech convention on Wednesday, Folks Inc CEO Neil Vogel—whose agency’s titles embody Folks and Meals & Wine—mentioned different massive AI corporations are paying for publishers to make use of the content material they create, however that Google has up to now refused.
“Some AI shops are good actors. Open AI is a good guy,” mentioned Vogel. “The worst guy is Google.”
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince, who was additionally on Wednesday’s Brainstorm panel, mentioned it has turn into far more durable for web sites to draw site visitors at a time when AI corporations function “answer engines” that present what individuals are in search of in fast snippets.
Prince noticed that, up to now, Google served as a “great patron” to the Web by ingesting the content material of internet pages so as to show hyperlinks to these pages in response to individuals’s search queries. This association directed site visitors to firms’ web sites, providing them an opportunity to generate income from the guests.
In the present day, that site visitors is falling dramatically since AI-generated solutions usually present all the knowledge customers want. Google is amongst these supplying AI solutions based mostly on info it has crawled from firms’ web sites however, not like its conventional search outcomes, Google’s AI solutions don’t ship the identical site visitors to web sites—main the likes of Vogel to stress that publishers have already traded analog {dollars} for digital dimes, and are actually buying and selling these dimes for AI pennies.
Within the case of different massive AI firms, publishers have obtained some leverage by working with corporations like Cloudflare to chop off the so-called crawlers that learn and ingest their content material. Within the case of Google, although, that hasn’t proved a viable choice for the reason that firm’s crawler for AI is identical because it makes use of for exhibiting search outcomes. A writer intent on stopping Google’s AI machine from crawling its content material must sacrifice its discoverability in search too.
Vogel famous that, whereas Google searches are bringing much less site visitors to Folks Inc web sites than up to now, they nonetheless account for between 25-30% of visits, making it financially unviable to chop off the corporate’s crawlers. He added that some AI corporations have already agreed to pay content material creators—together with Anthropic, which this month reached a $1.5 billion settlement with guide publishers—and that others are actively engaged on comparable preparations. The exception is Google, which Vogel dubbed a “bad actor.”
Google declined to touch upon Vogel’s remarks.
The YouTube mannequin as a attainable resolution
The present controversy over Google and different massive AI’s use of others’ content material has sturdy echoes of the early web period. That period—and Google—may supply an answer. Invoice Gross, an influential early Web determine credited with pioneering the paid search promoting enterprise mannequin and who’s now founder and writer of ProRata.ai, factors to what occurred with YouTube, which Google acquired in 2006.
Stuart Isett/Fortune
In its early days, YouTube outraged content material creators like musicians and film studios by letting customers blatantly pirate their content material. This triggered a sequence of lawsuits however, in time, YouTube got here up with a compromise: It could give creators the choice to monetize their content material by means of promoting. That resolution has proved workable and mutually useful for greater than a decade—Google says it has paid greater than $12 billion in shared advert income to rights holders as of December 2024—and Gross says it could work equally effectively for the AI period.
“The right way to solve this is not with lawsuits but with royalties,” mentioned Gross, whose agency provides AI-related monetization choices. “It opens up incentives for lots of new content to be created.”
Prince sounded much more bullish, predicting a “golden age” the place AI firms would supply annual funds to those that produced distinctive and precious content material. He cited current offers during which OpenAI agreed to pay the New York Occasions, Reddit and others.
Not everybody, nevertheless, is optimistic that the AI period might be an enchancment. Janice Min, the CEO of Ankler Media, says that the previous twenty years present that massive tech platforms like Google and Fb could quickly create preparations that profit publishers—however that they are going to abruptly yank them away as quickly as they get what they want.
“I don’t see any benefit to partnerships with AI,” mentioned Min. “I see the tech story happening over and over again. They come in and offer you money and it’s hard not to say no to shiny things.”
Fortune International Discussion board returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and international leaders will collect for a dynamic, invitation-only occasion shaping the way forward for enterprise. Apply for an invite.
