A sweeping Reuters investigation has put a price ticket on Meta’s tolerance for advert fraud: billions of {dollars} a 12 months. For Rob Leathern, a former Meta govt who led the corporate’s enterprise integrity operations till 2019, the findings expose a stark pressure between income development and shopper hurt.
The report, printed Monday, discovered that Meta generated roughly $18 billion in promoting income from China in 2024, round 10% of its world income, whilst inside paperwork confirmed that almost one-fifth of that (about $3 billion) got here from advertisements tied to scams, unlawful playing, pornography, and different prohibited exercise. Meta internally labeled China its high “scam exporting nation,” accounting for 25% of all rip-off and banned-product advertisements globally, in keeping with the report.
Meta’s core social media platforms (Fb, Instagram, WhatsApp) are blocked in China, however the firm nonetheless earns billions from Chinese language advertisers concentrating on world customers.
The investigation, Leathern instructed Fortune, illuminates a number of points with each Meta and the broader Chinese language advert market. “It appears that a variety of business partners that Meta has are not conducting themselves in an ethical way and or there are employees of those companies that are not doing what they’re supposed to be doing,” he stated. “It’s quite telling that Meta took down its entire partner directory, which obviously means that they must be reviewing their partners, and there’s a lot of them.”
“Scams are spiking across the internet, driven by persistent criminals and sophisticated, organized crime syndicates constantly evolving their schemes to evade detection. We are focused on rooting them out by using advanced technical measures and new tools, disrupting criminal scam networks, working with industry partners and law enforcement, and raising awareness on our platforms about scam activity. And when we determine that bad actors have violated our rules prohibiting fraud and scams, we take action,” a Meta spokesperson instructed Fortune in an announcement.
Meta communications chief Andy Stone, nevertheless, pushed again on the investigation, posting on Threads, “Once again, Reuters is misconstruing and misrepresenting the facts.” He argued that CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s “integrity strategy pivot”—which included instructing the China ads-enforcement group to reportedly “pause” its work—was to enhance groups’ targets and “instruct them to redouble efforts to fight frauds and scams globally, not just from specific markets.”
Stone additionally claimed that these groups have “doubled their fraud and scam reduction goal and over the last 15 months, user reports of scam ads have declined by well over 50%.”
The revelations printed by Reuters echo—however far exceed—the AI-driven deepfake scheme earlier this 12 months involving Goldman Sachs throughout which scammers used AI-generated movies of funding strategist Abby Joseph Cohen to lure retail buyers into fraudulent WhatsApp teams through Instagram advertisements.
Reuters’ reporting suggests Meta’s China-linked rip-off downside shouldn’t be an edge case or a blind spot, however an allegedly recognized and profitable phase of its promoting enterprise.
In response to inside estimates cited by Reuters, Meta served as many as 15 billion “high-risk” fraudulent advertisements per day, producing roughly $7 billion yearly. The corporate required a 95% confidence threshold earlier than banning fraudulent advertisers; these falling beneath it had been usually allowed to proceed working, generally at larger charges. Meta additionally established a 0.15% income “guardrail” (about $135 million) as the utmost income it was keen to forgo to crack down on suspicious advertisements, even because it earned $3.5 billion each six months from advertisements deemed to hold “higher legal risk.”
Inner decision-making was specific. When enforcement employees proposed shutting down fraudulent accounts, inside paperwork reviewed by Reuters confirmed they sought assurance that development groups wouldn’t object “given the revenue impact.” Requested whether or not Meta would penalize high-spending Chinese language companions working scams, the reply was reportedly “No,” citing “high revenue impact.” Inner assessments reportedly famous that income from dangerous advertisements would “almost certainly exceed the cost of any regulatory settlement,” successfully treating fines as a value of doing enterprise.
In late 2024, Meta reinstated 4,000 second-tier Chinese language advert businesses that had beforehand been suspended, unlocking $240 million in annualized income—roughly half of it tied to advertisements violating Meta’s personal security insurance policies, in keeping with the investigation. Greater than 75% of dangerous advert spending, Reuters discovered, got here from accounts benefiting from Meta’s companion protections. The corporate additionally disbanded its China-focused anti-scam group.
An exterior audit commissioned by Meta from the Propellerfish Group reached a blunt conclusion when investigating fraud and scams on the platform: Meta’s “own behavior and policies” had been selling systemic corruption in China’s promoting ecosystem. Reuters reported that the corporate largely ignored the findings and expanded operations anyway.
Leathern, who reviewed the reporting and inside figures referenced within the report, instructed Fortune the dimensions of the issue was tough to defend. “I was disappointed that the violation rates for the China-specific advertisers were as high as they were in the last year,” he stated. “It’s disappointing, because there are ways to make it lower.”
His critique goes to the center of the failure. Platforms, he stated, ought to maintain middleman businesses accountable for the standard of advertisers they bring about in. “If you’re measuring violation rates coming from certain partners, and those rates are above a threshold every quarter or every year, you can just fire your worst-performing customers,” he stated.
“I think it’s important for us to have some sense of transparency into how policies are being enforced and what companies are doing in terms of reducing scams on their platforms,” Leathern added.
During the last 18 months, Meta has eliminated or rejected greater than 46 million commercials positioned through so-called resellers, or giant Chinese language advert corporations. And greater than 99% of advert accounts related to resellers discovered to be violating the corporate’s fraud insurance policies had been proactively detected and disabled.
Other than a necessity for transparency, Leathern warned that prioritizing short-term income over belief in the end threatens the enterprise itself. “If people don’t trust advertisers, advertising, it reduces the effectiveness of that channel for all advertisers,” he stated. “There’s a lot of risk to their business, directly and indirectly, from not doing a good enough job on stopping scams.”
The human price is already seen. Reuters documented victims throughout North America and Asia, together with U.S. and Canadian buyers who misplaced life financial savings to pretend inventory and crypto advertisements, Taiwanese shoppers misled into shopping for counterfeit well being merchandise, and a Canadian Air Drive recruiter whose Fb account was hijacked to run crypto scams. Meta’s personal inside security employees estimated the corporate’s platforms had been “involved” in roughly one-third of all profitable U.S. scams, linked to greater than $50 billion in shopper losses.
The issue is intensifying as generative AI lowers the barrier for scammers. “You can create something that looks plausible far more easily than ever before,” Leathern stated. “The speed and adaptability of criminals and their use of AI tools just makes the environment far more tricky.”
But Leathern stated platforms like Meta haven’t been sufficiently clear about how aggressively they’re utilizing those self same instruments to struggle abuse. “We just don’t have a ton of insight into what they’re doing to reduce scams and fraud coming in through ads,” he stated.
For Leathern, the investigation must be a turning level. “I hope they see this as an opportunity to improve things for people,” he stated.
