It’s not the yr 2000, and there’s not an impending tech bubble, however that doesn’t imply buyers shouldn’t be bracing for turbulence, Financial institution of America Analysis says. Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities’ head of U.S. fairness and quantitative technique, has been arguing that in comparison with the dotcom period, immediately’s AI increase has supported earnings development, smaller IPOs, and “speculation in unprofitable stocks is less extreme.” Nevertheless, she warned that aggressive capital expenditures from hyperscalers is more and more counting on debt, presenting hazard for buyers nonetheless eagerly awaiting returns.
“Is this 2000? Are we in a bubble? No,” Subramanian mentioned throughout BofA’s outlook name on Tuesday. “Will AI continue unfettered in leadership? Also no.”
Subramanian unpacked her ideas in a current notice on the way forward for AI, which she sees as someplace between totally dependable and an all-out bubble burst, the place capital spending remains to be larger than income development. “On AI, in our view, investors should get ready for an air pocket,” Subramanian wrote. “Monetization is to be determined (TBD) and power is the bottleneck and will take a while to build out. So for now investors are buying the dream.”
BofA took a extra bearish stance on its inventory market outlook for 2026 on account of these air pocket issues, forecasting only a 4% upside for the S&P 500 from the place it presently sits. It breaks from the extra bullish takes of analysts, together with Deutsche Financial institution’s wager on a 17% bounce on the finish of subsequent yr and market veteran Ed Yardeni’s prediction of the S&P rising one other 10% from this yr to subsequent.
Jean Boivin, head of the BlackRock Funding Institute, mirrored Subramanian’s stance on the AI increase, saying at a media roundtable on Tuesday that there’s sufficient skepticism from buyers and markets that there shouldn’t be an excessive amount of concern of a bubble.
“We don’t think the bubble framing is that useful at this stage for investors,” Boivin mentioned. “There is so much talk about the potential of the bubble … people are conscious of the risk. It’s when there’s no discussion of that that we should be more worried.”
Wholesome skepticism
“One should have some exposure to the S&P 500 and should certainly also have some exposure to AI,” Slok instructed Fortune in July. “But it’s very clear that [owing to] the market’s extreme focus and concentration on this story, this is the time to have a conversation around, What are the things I should be doing with my money?”
Along with smaller IPOs and fewer excessive hypothesis in unprofitable shares, Subramanian mentioned, markets have some wholesome skepticism about Massive Tech’s capex spending. Meta’s October earnings report sparked a selloff that dropped shares by 9%, following CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitting the corporate raised in steering for capital expenditures by $2 billion.
‘Air pocket’ wariness
The continued capex push can also be what has made analysts jittery about an AI air pocket. In accordance with Financial institution of America, buyers are proper to be involved with hyperscalers’ rising capex spending, significantly on knowledge facilities, which surged 53% year-over-year to $134 billion in simply the primary quarter of this yr, Dell’Oro Group discovered. Google turned the newest tech big to increase its knowledge middle footprint final month, pledging $40 billion to rising its AI compute infrastructure in Texas.
Nevertheless, “capex funded by operating cash flow is running out,” Subramanian famous, with hyperscalers more and more funding operations by way of debt. She famous the provision of AI infrastructure has elevated by greater than 1,000% from 2024 to 2025.
Certainly, BofA analyst Yuri Seliger wrote in a analysis notice final month that the 5 hyperscalers—Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle—issued $121 billion in debt this yr alone, a whopping four-time the common debt the businesses points yearly within the final 5 years. Seliger added that he anticipated an extra $100 million in debt raised in 2026.
By IBM CEO Arvind Krishna’s back-of-the-napkin math, these hyperscalers’ massive bets on rising AI provide gained’t be price it, as they are going to be unable to show a revenue from the steep funding in knowledge facilities. They are going to be made weak from AI’s quickly advancing know-how, which might render immediately’s infrastructure out of date.
“It’s my view that there’s no way you’re going to get a return on that because $8 trillion of CapEx means you need roughly $800 billion of profit just to pay for the interest,” Krishna mentioned in a Monday episode of the Decoder podcast. “You’ve got to use it all in five years because at that point, you’ve got to throw it away and refill it.”
