- Disney indicators a $1 billion, three-year AI partnership with OpenAI for character use with Sora.
- Disney accused Google’s Gemini AI of large copyright infringement of character likenesses.
- OpenAI can generate Disney photographs/movies, however can’t use Disney expertise likenesses or voices.
AI got here for the authors (together with Recreation of Thrones’ George R.R. Martin)… and Hollywood sort of shrugged. Then, AI got here for Disney’s (DIS) mental property – and knives have been immediately drawn.
Or, fairly, they have been drawn as quickly as Disney signed a three-year, $1 billion partnership with OpenAI this Thursday. The deal, which set the tone for AI trade mental property partnerships going ahead, will deliver basic Disney characters (suppose Mickey Mouse), Marvel and Star Wars heroes, and animated stars from latest hits (suppose “Moana”, Pixar’s “Inside Out”, and “Zootopia’) to OpenAI’s Sora, per Disney’s Dec. 11 press release.
Disney preempted the announcement of this deal by delivering a cease-and-desist letter to Google (GOOG) on Wednesday evening. The letter accuses Google (and Google’s Gemini AI) of widespread copyright infringement in relation to popular Disney character likenesses, per Variety’s reporting.
Related: ‘Wicked: For Good’ box office shocks Disney, critics
The letter conveyed Disney’s message in stark terms:
“Google is infringing Disney’s copyrights on an enormous scale, by copying a big corpus of Disney’s copyrighted works with out authorization to coach and develop generative synthetic intelligence (‘AI’) fashions and companies, and by utilizing AI fashions and companies to commercially exploit and distribute copies of its protected works to customers,” the letter by law firm Jenner & Block on behalf of Disney read Dec. 10th.
The timing is both convenient and likely necessary if Disney and OpenAI want to keep Disney’s intellectual property (IP) only available for AI work on Sora. This deal broke new ground for how IP licensing for AI models could work (OpenAI itself was bold enough to dub it a “landmark deal”), so this lawsuit will set an important precedent. I tease out the details, including what characters Disney particularly has its eyes on protecting, below.
Disney: Google AI intellectual property violations on “a mass scale”
Disney’s latest cease-and-desist letter claims that Google’s copyright violations have been wide-reaching and that their damage has been compounded by Gemini branding on the resulting content. It gets specific, citing particular characters and content that Disney’s legal representatives have earmarked as flagrant examples (summarized below).
“Google operates as a digital merchandising machine, able to reproducing, rendering, and distributing copies of Disney’s precious library of copyrighted characters and different works on a mass scale,” read Disney’s letter to Google per Deadline.
“Compounding Google’s blatant infringement, most of the infringing photographs generated by Google’s AI Companies are branded with Google’s Gemini emblem, falsely implying that Google’s exploitation of Disney’s mental property is permitted and endorsed by Disney.”
Extra Disney:
- Walt Disney is the one film firm that issues
- Disney makes daring assertion on Warner Bros. buy
- AMC inventory secretly depends on these upcoming Disney movies
Such strongly worded language signifies that Disney’s licensing partnership with OpenAI and Sora has emboldened the Mouse Home, spurring it to check the waters of AI infringement on a scale we’ve got but to see. Working example, inside this week’s cease-and-desist to Google, Disney went on to quote particular photographs, paired with the immediate textual content that generated them, which they imagine are copyright infringements.
They started with this Darth Vader picture, which they declare was generated by Gemini:
Supply: Selection
Disney continued from there, earmarking a number of high-priority examples from their canon which can be being violated. They cited characters from the next franchises (knowledge from the newest movie of every collection):
Disney properties infringed by Google AI, Gemini
- “Avengers: Endgame” (2019): $2,717,503,922 (Worldwide Field Workplace)
- “Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens” (2015): $2,056,046,83
- “Inside Out 2” (2024): $1,698,831,782
- “The Lion King” (2019): $1,661,454,403
- “Frozen 2” (2019): $1,451,653,316
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” (2025): $1,338,071,348
- “Toy Story 4” (2019): $1,071,177,215
- “Moana 2” (2016): $1,059,135,998
- “Lilo & Stich” (2025): $1,038,009,248
- “Guardians of the Galaxy 3″ (2023): $845,555,777
- “Ratatouille” (2007): $626,549,695
- “The Little Mermaid” (2023): $569,626,289
- “Monsters Inc.” (2001): $560,483,536
- “Brave” (2012): $554,606,532
Supply: The Numbers
What can OpenAI do with Disney characters?
This lawsuit ought to, to some extent, silo off Disney characters to be used solely by OpenAI’s Sora. The diploma to which this shall be true, and whether or not will probably be enforceable, stays to be seen.
This is what Sora will – and will not – have the ability to do with its new IP treasure trove:
What Disney Sora AI can do
OpenAI’s partnership with Disney does permit customers to generate brief video content material and pictures with Disney character likenesses.
“Sora will be able to generate short videos from user prompts, drawing from more than 200 “animated, masked and creature characters, in addition to from costumes, environments, props, and automobiles owned by Disney,” per Axios. “Customers also can harness ChatGPT Photos to create stills utilizing the identical mental property.”
What Disney Sora AI can’t do
OpenAI’s Sora notably doesn’t cover the use of Disney talent likenesses or voices. This clarification is a biggie, as concerns from SAG-AFTRA and other Hollywood creative talent agencies – which were already high with multiple ongoing legal actions – are spiking in response to the OpenAI and Disney agreement, according to the Hollywood Reporter.
SAG-AFTRA issued a statement Thursday that both acknowledged the agreement and their cooperation with Disney, and conveyed their clear voiced reproach of Google alongside Disney. Per SAG-AFTRA’s Dec. 11 statement:
Hot water for Google (and the entire AI industry). Fortunately for them, Google has nearly unlimited resources, so if this does go to court, I would expect a protracted process. The quality level of the AI-assisted fan content will also come out in the wash. As with most tools, I expect it will vary greatly in accordance with user skill (aka there will be a few genuinely mind-blowing works amongst an ocean of slop).
Associated: ‘Zootopia 2’ sees prompt box-office success for Disney, however there is a secret
