AI coding-assistant start-up Cursor isn’t simply utilizing synthetic intelligence to assist builders write code, it’s deploying AI throughout its personal inner operations, CEO, Michael Truell, instructed the viewers at Fortune’s Brainstorm AI in San Francisco.
Truell mentioned the corporate had already automated roughly 80% of its buyer assist tickets with the assistance of the expertise. He mentioned the corporate had additionally applied an inner AI-powered communication system that permits staff to question data throughout the group. “We’ve actually done a lot of work internally on customizing that setup,” he mentioned.
Cursor additionally makes use of AI for inner communications, he mentioned. “We have a system where folks can ask any question about the company and get it answered by an AI,” Truell mentioned, in addition to an mission with “a few forward deployed engineers internally embedded throughout, building custom tooling right now for operations, for sales and experimenting,” he mentioned.
Throughout the enterprise software program panorama, some bigger organizations are more and more arising towards adoption challenges when making an attempt to combine AI into workflows.
Knowledge silos—the place data is trapped in disconnected programs—forestall AI instruments from accessing the total context they must be helpful, and technical sprawl—the buildup of disparate instruments and platforms over years of progress— can create integration points. Many organizations are discovering they want extra devoted technical experience to assist tailor AI fashions to particular enterprise wants.
Engineers are seeing productiveness positive factors
Cursor, which is valued at $29.3 billion, mentioned final month it had crossed $1 billion in annualized income and now has greater than 300 staff. The corporate has seen speedy progress because it was based by a group of 4 MIT graduates in 2022. The corporate’s AI coding device, which first launched in 2023, has been common with software program who use it to assist each generate and edit code.
There was some conflicting analysis about how useful AI instruments truly are for software program engineering. A July 2025 research by the nonprofit analysis group METR discovered that skilled builders engaged on giant, mature codebases truly took 19% longer to finish duties when utilizing AI instruments comparable to Cursor and Claude, regardless of believing that they had labored 20% sooner. The researchers attributed the slowdown to time spent prompting AI, ready for responses, and time reviewing generated code.
A latest research performed by College of Chicago discovered that groups utilizing Cursor’s AI coding assistant in giant corporations merged 39% extra pull requests (PRs) in comparison with non-users. The analysis additionally confirmed that senior builders created extra detailed plans earlier than writing code and demonstrated higher ability working with AI brokers.
“A lot of folks think that junior developers get the most out of AI,” Truell mentioned. However “when these academics went in and looked at the data, it looked like senior engineers actually were more effective in using the tools and were accepting code at higher rates and were getting more value from that.”
Truell famous that this stunned him as nicely: “We want to dig into to understand exactly why that’s the case.”
