Consensus Hong Kong 2026 was, by many accounts, an RWA convention that occurred to be about crypto. Throughout primary levels, facet occasions, and sponsored panels, real-world asset tokenization dominated the dialog — however not in the best way it did a yr in the past.
The pitch decks have given option to real disagreements about structure, regulation, and what tokenization really solves. Right here’s what’s really being argued.
Stablecoins Are RWA — and Everybody Now Agrees
One of many clearest factors of consensus was that essentially the most profitable RWA already exists. “Essentially the most profitable RWA is USDT,” stated CJ Fong, Managing Director and Head of APAC and EMEA Gross sales at GSR, throughout a panel on the primary convention.
On the Gate’s facet occasion, Chunda McCain, co-founder of Paxos Labs, described surging demand for PAXG, the agency’s gold-backed token, as proof that stablecoins are increasing past greenback pegs into commodities and treasuries. Paxos secured its OCC conditional license in December and holds regulatory approvals in Singapore, Finland, and Abu Dhabi — a multi-jurisdictional technique constructed across the assumption that stablecoins and tokenized property are converging.
Brian Mehler, CEO of cost blockchain Secure, strengthened the purpose from the infrastructure facet. His firm’s USDT Zero system eliminates fuel charges completely — ship 100 USDT, and 99.999 USDT arrives. On the Stablecoin Odyssey facet occasion, Mehler in contrast the aim to Swift: the person shouldn’t know they’re on a blockchain.
The implication is that the stablecoin-RWA boundary is more and more synthetic. As stablecoins again themselves with T-bills, gold, and structured merchandise, and as RWA platforms settle in USDC, the 2 classes are merging right into a single tokenized finance layer.
The Structure Conflict: Permissioned vs Permissionless
The sharpest disagreement on the convention got here from two corporations that nominally do the identical factor.
On the Consensus mainstage session “Tokenizing the Planet,” Graham Ferguson, Head of Ecosystem at Securitize, and Min Lin, Managing Director of International Enlargement at Ondo, laid out essentially totally different visions.
Securitize advocates for native token issuance below a permissioned framework. Ferguson argued that wrapper fashions — the place an current off-chain asset is wrapped into an on-chain token — create distance between the underlying asset and the investor, weakening safety. With BlackRock’s BUIDL fund surpassing $1 billion in AUM, he pointed to the monitor file of issuing securities immediately on-chain with compliance in-built.
Ondo takes the other path: permissionless wrappers that prioritize DeFi composability and world distribution. Min Lin argued that the mannequin integrates extra shortly with current DeFi protocols and removes gatekeepers, a bonus significantly related for reaching buyers throughout Asia. The corporate is actively increasing into Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan.
In a follow-up interview with BeInCrypto, Ferguson questioned whether or not wrapper fashions can present satisfactory investor safety. He additionally detailed Securitize’s plans to broaden DeFi partnerships whereas sustaining its permissioned structure.
The binary might already be outdated, although. At Stablecoin Odyssey’s RWA panel, Conflux CSO Forgiven described a stay hybrid case: renewable vitality property packaged by a monetary firm and wrapped right into a DeFi protocol. It’s a permissionless distribution of a regulated, real-world asset — a construction that doesn’t match neatly into both camp.
Settlement Velocity: The Argument That Retains Successful
If one declare was repeated most throughout venues, it was that tokenization’s killer function isn’t entry or transparency — it’s velocity.
Conflux’s Forgiven supplied essentially the most concrete benchmark: deposit USDC, obtain quick affirmation; request redemption, get USDC again inside one hour. “Sooner than T+0,” he famous, towards conventional settlement cycles that may stretch to days.
The composability argument extends this additional. A number of panelists throughout classes famous a limitation in conventional finance. Shopping for an asset and utilizing it as collateral instantly is structurally unimaginable. On-chain, it’s native performance.
Secure’s Mehler highlighted a sensible ache level that bridges concept and actuality: in the course of the current market selloff, ETH fuel worth volatility doubled transaction prices for companies shifting stablecoins. His fixed-cost USDT switch mannequin eliminates that variable, which issues when enterprises are processing hundreds of transactions each day.
Bodily Property: The place the Narrative Meets Friction
The dear metals session at HashKey Cloud’s occasion supplied a actuality examine. Ronald Tan, Director of Silver Instances Restricted, walked by way of the logistics of the silver market: warehouse prices, transportation challenges, and US-China export restrictions that don’t vanish when a token is minted.
That is the hole between monetary RWA and bodily RWA. Treasuries and fund shares can settle immediately as a result of the underlying asset is already recorded within the ledger. Metals, vitality, and actual property require verification that the bodily asset exists and is correctly custodied.
Paxos’s PAXG expertise — gold tokens backed by allotted bars in London vaults — reveals it will probably work at scale, however McCain acknowledged the corporate is committing further assets to fulfill surging demand. The infrastructure for physical-asset tokenization is actual, however removed from trivial.
Asia because the Middle of Gravity
Throughout all classes, Asia — and Hong Kong particularly — emerged because the gravitational middle of the RWA narrative.
Ondo is focusing on Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan for growth. Securitize’s Ferguson advised BeInCrypto that the corporate would prioritize jurisdictions with regulatory readability, naming the identical cities. Paxos already holds a Singapore MAS license. HashKey, as each an occasion host and a market participant, anchored a number of panels on Hong Kong’s positioning.
Forgiven of Conflux described its firm as a uncommon Chinese language blockchain undertaking utilizing actual names. Its renewable vitality RWA product was designed particularly for the Hong Kong market.
The subtext is evident: whereas US regulatory battles over stablecoin laws and the Readability Act proceed — some extent Anthony Scaramucci made forcefully in his personal Consensus look — Asia is constructing the infrastructure and establishing the precedents.
What’s Truly at Stake
The RWA dialog at Consensus Hong Kong revealed an trade that has moved previous the query of whether or not tokenization will occur. The arguments now middle on how—permissioned or permissionless, monetary or bodily, institutional or retail-first—and the solutions are diverging by asset class, jurisdiction, and enterprise mannequin.
The stablecoin-RWA convergence might show to be essentially the most consequential shift. If essentially the most profitable tokenized property are stablecoins, and stablecoins are more and more backed by real-world property, the whole framing of RWA as a separate sector might not survive 2026.
The put up The RWA Conflict: Stablecoins, Velocity, and Management appeared first on BeInCrypto.
