Claude vs. ChatGPT: What I Discovered After 30 Days of Use

I’ve been utilizing ChatGPT for analysis and rephrasing functions for 2 years now. In its preliminary part, the analysis was generic. However I discovered my very own approach to take advantage of it: I gave video transcripts as enter to assemble significant quotes from consultants. AI helped me with fast quotes that I can use in my writing. 

As ChatGPT advanced, its analysis began getting higher. At current, ChatGPT’s Deep Analysis is exceptionally correct because it provides hyperlinks to info sources that I can confirm if wanted. Nonetheless, it has its limits on the Free and Plus plans. I made a decision to search out an alternate AI chatbot and in contrast Claude vs. ChatGPT. 

I began evaluating Anthropic’s Claude, not only for analysis but in addition for functions related to my position as a content material marketer. After spending some severe time with each platforms, I discovered that ChatGPT is nice for deep analysis and picture era, whereas Claude is greatest for artistic writing and coding. 

Inquisitive about my outcomes? Let’s dig into the analysis on it!

Claude vs. ChatGPT at a look

Characteristic
Claude
ChatGPT

G2 score
4.4/5
4.7/5

Fashions
Free: Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Opus 3, Claude Sonnet 3.7, Claude Haiku 3.5
Paid: Provides on Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Opus 4
Free: GPT-5
Paid: Provides on Sora for video era, GPT-5 Professional, OpenAI o3‑professional, ChatGPT Agent

Context window
200,000 for all fashions; Claude Sonnet 4 has 1 million tokens in beta testing. 
Output token ranges from 4096 to 64000, relying on fashions. 
GPT-5 context window: 400,000; Most output token: 128,000 

Greatest for
Inventive writing and coding
Deep analysis and picture era

Analysis functionality
Floor-level analysis with Claude fashions. Analysis options are nonetheless in beta testing.
Deep Analysis capabilities with info from credible sources. 

Writing and enhancing
Partaking writing fashion that provides complicated info in a easy means. 
Writing is easy however usually tutorial till specified in any other case. 

Coding
Claude Code will be added to your terminal; transforms complicated performance expectations into working code.
Sturdy at producing and debugging code throughout many languages, however would not deal with extremely complicated, multi-step performance necessities successfully.

Picture era
Doesn’t have in-built picture era capabilities, however can try to create SVG illustrations from prompts.
Can generate detailed pictures in numerous types and codecs by built-in picture era in GPT-4o mannequin.

Video era
No
Sure, with Sora

Voice mode
Sure
Sure

Free plan
Accessible
Accessible

Pricing
Professional: $17/month
Max: $100/month
Group: $25/consumer
Plus: $20/month
Professional: $200/month
Group: $25/month/consumer

Word: Each Anthropic and OpenAI often roll out new updates to those AI chatbots. The small print under mirror capabilities as of August 2025 and should change over time.

Claude does a very good job of writing creatively and excels in summarization, enhancing, and complicated reasoning.  ChatGPT is a extra versatile,  broader all-purpose AI assistant, with built-in picture era, net searching, deep analysis, and customized GPTs, making it higher fitted to a wider vary of artistic and analysis duties.

The selection between the 2 finally converges into what’s the one factor you need the AI sidekick to automate, which saves a whole lot of your time. 

Claude vs. ChatGPT: Key variations and similarities

Earlier than we start the head-to-head testing, I would like you to look at the AI chatbot platforms and their options extra intently. They’re each spectacular, however the satan’s within the particulars, is not it? Let’s break them down and see what units them aside.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: What’s totally different?

Let’s speak specifics. Right here’s the place Claude and ChatGPT set themselves aside:

• AI fashions and processing energy: Claude runs on Anthropic’s Claude 4 and Claude 3 household (Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus) with context home windows as much as 200K tokens, making it best for prolonged, uninterrupted conversations. ChatGPT now runs on OpenAI’s GPT-5, changing its legacy GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o mini, and different fashions. GPT-5 gives 128K token context home windows and improved reasoning velocity and accuracy throughout a wide range of process sorts.
• Multimodal capabilities: ChatGPT is totally multimodal in GPT-5, in a position to course of and generate textual content, pictures, and audio straight in chat. Its picture era is built-in, producing visuals in numerous types and codecs on demand. Claude stays primarily text-based however can generate SVG illustrations by outputting code from prompts; it doesn’t have a local picture era capabilities but.
• Integrations: Each Claude and ChatGPT help the Mannequin Context Protocol (MCP), which permits them to securely hook up with exterior instruments, APIs, and native information. ChatGPT connects with different functions and providers by way of built-in connectors too, enabling it to tug in information or take actions throughout platforms like Google Drive and different supported third-party apps inside its chat interface. 
• Accuracy: ChatGPT appears fairly correct in following the instructions given in a immediate. Nonetheless, when experimenting with picture era, I discovered Claude hallucinating whereas following clear directions.
• Content material era: ChatGPT’s content material era is pretty simple. Typically, it produces repetitive responses relating to content material structuring or makes use of repetitive, bland phrases. Though, when prompted to do in any other case, it listens. Claude offers an open method to set the fashion of its response whereas prompting, permitting customers to set the tone proactively and get related outcomes.
• Customization: Claude gives methods to customise the interface, comparable to selecting the colour mode and chat font. ChatGPT gives some customizations when it comes to themes and accent colors however doesn’t supply customization when it involves fonts, which is perhaps essential for some individuals.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: What’s related?

There are a number of similarities between Claude and ChatGPT, together with: 

• Writing partaking content material: Each Claude and ChatGPT enable customers to create partaking content material primarily based on textual prompts. With subsequent prompts, one would possibly have to refine the fashion and tone on ChatGPT. However, Claude means that you can set the tone whereas writing the immediate.
• Availability of free plan: Each Claude and ChatGPT supply a free plan. On the free plan, you should use deep analysis in ChatGPT as much as 5 duties per consumer per thirty days. Claude’s deep analysis is presently being examined in beta. It may also be out there in a free plan as much as a particular restrict.
• Interface: The 2 AI chatbots have a clear, superintuitive interface. Throughout onboarding, the platforms help you with various things you are able to do utilizing them. 
• Net search: Each can retrieve real-time info from the web.with a built-in searching instrument for open-ended net searches.
• Agent-like capabilities: Each Claude and ChatGPT can act in an agent-like method by executing multi-step duties, pulling information from linked sources, and interacting with exterior instruments. ChatGPT gives a extra mature Agent Mode that integrates with its connectors and may function throughout apps like Google Drive, Slack, and Jira. Claude gives related automation by its Analysis mode and Integrations constructed on MCP, permitting it to work with exterior APIs, instruments, and native information, although its agent-like options are nonetheless much less expansive than ChatGPT’s.

How I in contrast Claude vs. ChatGPT: my analysis standards

To ensure it was a good combat, I used their free variations of Claude and ChatGPT, and examined them in analysis, writing and rephrasing, coding, and picture era capabilities. 

I ensured full equity by utilizing an identical prompts for each, with no modifications or changes, simply the identical questions all through. Lastly, I evaluated the response for its accuracy, creativity, and value. 

I categorize an output as correct when the immediate’s response is as anticipated. The response’s engagement and construction displayed creativity. Lastly, the convenience of utilizing a response as is determines its usability. 

So as to add different consumer views, I additionally cross-checked my findings with G2 critiques to see how totally different customers expertise these fashions.

Disclaimer: AI responses could range primarily based on phrasing, session historical past, and system updates for a similar prompts. These outcomes mirror the fashions’ capabilities on the time of testing.

Claude Vs. ChatGPT: How they carried out in my assessments

I explored each platforms in-depth, highlighting why sure options stand out and what they imply for actual customers. By testing every instrument, I uncovered its strengths and limitations for a transparent, hands-on comparability. Let’s get began!

Analysis capabilities

To check each instruments’ analysis capabilities, I examined them with the identical immediate, “Compare Claude and ChatGPT in terms of research, writing, coding, and pricing. The purpose is to research the two platforms.”

Claude gave me a very good overview of the distinction between the 2 platforms in bullet factors for every functionality. Though this was useful, I doubted its credibility since no info sources have been talked about with it, the place I might confirm the details.

Claude gave me a high-level understanding of the variations, which helped me summarize. Nonetheless, this analysis wouldn’t assist a lot in making knowledgeable conclusions since verifying its accuracy was difficult. Claude’s Analysis remains to be in beta and is offered in just a few areas, together with the US, Japan, and Brazil. 

ChatGPT, then again, has a Deep Analysis function in its free model. It gives complete info on the variations between Claude and ChatGPT with dependable (and clickable) sources. This permits me to personally confirm the accuracy of the pointers I’d use to assemble my perspective on the 2 instruments.

Furthermore, you get a whole listing of sources and citations that ChatGPT used as a reference for the analysis. This makes ChatGPT’s response extra credible than Claude’s. 

Primarily based on my expertise on the platform, I really feel ChatGPT does higher in analysis than Claude. 

Winner: ChatGPT

Claude and ChatGPT will not be the one AI chatbots value testing. Right here’s how Gemini and Copilot stack up.

Writing and rephrasing

I in contrast Claude and ChatGPT primarily based on a immediate, “Write an informal essay on AI taking over the world.” Claude gave me an possibility to pick out the writing fashion whereas supplying the immediate. 

Claude’s response gave the impression to be extra partaking than ChatGPT’s. Claude used a Terminator analogy to assist me visualize its writing. It used brief sentences to keep up higher readability and saved the tone conversational. 

Once I examined the identical immediate in ChatGPT, I used to be shocked to see the consequence. The context it units is healthier and extra attention-grabbing than Claude’s. Nonetheless, the writing fashion is fairly bland. ChatGPT covers totally different angles of the subject whereas conveying its real-world impression. On the finish of its response, ChatGPT asks if a consumer would have a extra conversational or humorous tone. 

Claude and ChatGPT are tied when it comes to writing. I examined the 2 platforms’ rephrasing capabilities to discover a clear winner. 

I gave them a immediate: “Edit this to transform it into a conversation between two people. Use first- and second-person narrative. Write in active voice. Use a more humorous tone.” 

Whereas rephrasing and enhancing the response, Claude does an amazing job of reworking the essay right into a dialogue. It suggests the feelings or actions an individual takes along with delivering their dialogue. You possibly can simply convert it right into a skit or a task play with out making a whole lot of edits.

ChatGPT did a good job of reworking this content material right into a dialogue. Nonetheless, the stream and vocabulary weren’t pretty much as good as Claude’s. Due to this fact, in the case of writing and rephrasing, Claude is a extra appropriate alternative. 

Winner: Claude

Coding

I examined the coding capabilities of the 2 AI chatbot platforms primarily based on the immediate under.  

I instructed the instruments to jot down code for the homepage of DAYFIVE, a content material advertising providers firm. I briefly overviewed how I visualized the homepage, together with the required components. 

I used to be amazed to see the consequence on each platforms. 

Anthropic’s Claude gave me a vibrant design. It delivered on the complicated request, the place I wished testimonials to slip horizontally on scrolling. Total, it gave me a code construction to work on to edit to make adjustments within the copy and graphics. 

I used the identical immediate on ChatGPT. Nonetheless, it didn’t add horizontal motion to the testimonial. I used to be in a position to scroll by the testimonials manually. Total, I appreciated Claude’s output higher than ChatGPT’s in the case of coding. 

In the case of performance, ChatGPT allowed me to remodel the HTML5 code into JavaScript and numerous different languages. By way of flexibility, ChatGPT supplied higher choices. 

Primarily based on what I noticed, there’s a tie between Claude and ChatGPT for a coding use case.  A coding professional will be capable of see the variations extra clearly. 

Winner: Tie (each Claude and ChatGPT)

Picture era

I examined the 2 AI chatbot instruments for his or her picture era capabilities on the identical immediate. I requested the instruments to “Create an image to depict a sunset with orange sky and a person standing in the middle of a lush green landscape. The person writes with a feather and sketches the landscape in their notebook.”

The winner stood out, and the output generated was means higher than its counterpart. Right here’s what Claude generated as a response to the picture creation process: 

Claude didn’t do a very good job when it comes to accuracy and visualization. 

ChatGPT generated a good looking image that was near expectations within the immediate. Right here’s ChatGPT’s output: 

In comparison with Claude, ChatGPT’s free plan creates higher pictures primarily based on a immediate. 

Winner: ChatGPT

Pricing

Each Claude and ChatGPT supply a free plan. Claude’s paid plans’ pricing is as follows:

• Professional: $17/month
• Max: $100/month
• Group: $25/month/member (minimal 5 members required)

ChatGPT’s pricing is considerably related, aside from a number of plan variations. ChatGPT’s paid plans value: 

• Plus: $20/month
• Professional: $200/month
• Group: $25/month/consumer

The ChatGPT crew plan requires greater than 2 years and is billed yearly. 

Right here’s the overview of ChatGPT pricing plans: 

ChatGPT expenses a little bit greater than Claude in its mid-tier plan. Nonetheless, that is justified contemplating its superior analysis and picture era capabilities. On the identical time, Claude gives first rate worth in writing and enhancing. I really feel it’s a tie between the 2 AI platforms in the case of pricing. 

Winner: Tie (each Claude and ChatGPT)

Claude vs. ChatGPT: Head-to-head comparability desk

Right here’s a desk exhibiting the net builder software program that wins.

Characteristic and performance
Winner
Why it gained

Analysis capabilities
ChatGPT 🏆
ChatGPT gained right here with its deep analysis functionality. Claude’s Analysis remains to be in its beta testing part.

Writing and rephrasing
Claude 🏆
Claude supplied a easy means to decide on a writing fashion and ship extra partaking content material. ChatGPT’s writing felt extra tutorial. 

Coding
Tie 
Claude delivered a extra visually interesting consequence with performance as anticipated within the immediate. ChatGPT supplied extra flexibility in remodeling code into totally different languages.

Picture Era
ChatGPT 🏆
ChatGPT was in a position to create the picture as anticipated within the immediate. Claude confirmed hallucinations. 

Pricing
Tie
ChatGPT is barely costly however justifies it with its accuracy, analysis capabilities, and picture creation proficiency. Claude does a very good job of writing and rephrasing. 

Key insights on Claude vs. ChatGPT from G2 information

I checked out assessment information on G2 primarily based on actual customers’ experiences to search out strengths and adoption patterns for Claude and ChatGPT. This is what stood out:

Satisfaction scores

• Claude excels in ease of use (97%), ease of setup (96%), and ease of doing enterprise (94%).
• ChatGPT ranks excessive in ease of use (94%). Nonetheless, it reveals first rate satisfaction scores for ease of doing enterprise (94%) and ease of setup (94%). 

Industries used

• Claude dominates in IT and providers, laptop software program, advertising and promoting, monetary providers, and better training.
• ChatGPT has a robust presence in IT and providers, laptop software program, advertising and promoting, monetary providers, and consulting. 

Highest-rated options

• Claude excels in understanding(92%), pure dialog (91%), and consumer interplay studying (91%).
• ChatGPT stands out for pure dialog (93%), creativity (90%), and understanding (89%). 

Lowest-rated options

• Claude struggles with information safety (85%), content material accuracy (85%), and studying (85%).
• ChatGPT additionally struggles with error studying (78%), software program integration (81%), and API flexibility (82%). 

We didn’t cease at testing Clause vs. ChatGPT. Check out our different AI face-offs to see which of them claimed the win.  

Incessantly requested questions on Claude vs. ChatGPT

Have extra questions? Discover extra solutions under.

Q1. What’s the data cutoff for Claude? 

Presently, Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4, (Anthropic’s newest fashions) have data cutoff information of January 2025.

Which means it was educated on information out there up till that time and doesn’t have built-in consciousness of occasions or developments after that date until up to date by exterior instruments or plugins.

Q2. What’s the data cutoff for ChatGPT?  

The data cut-off for ChatGPT, powered by GPT-5 is September 30, 2024.

This implies the mannequin was educated on information out there as much as that date and would not have data of occasions or developments after September 2024 until accessed by instruments like net searching.

Q3. Is Claude AI free?

Sure, Claude gives a free plan with restricted utilization of its core fashions and beta entry to some options like deep analysis. Paid plans unlock increased utilization limits and superior capabilities.

This fall. What are the constraints of Claude AI?

Claude has no native picture or audio era, fewer app integrations than ChatGPT, and its agent-like options are nonetheless growing in comparison with extra mature automation instruments.

Q5. Why do individuals like Claude AI? 

Individuals like Claude for coding and reasoning. Right here’s what Amir, a G2’s validated reviewer,  feedback on why they like Claude: 

“Claude AI is excellent for coding assistance, especially with its clear and structured explanations. It provides solutions and explains the logic, which helps me understand complex code and learn as I go. It’s also very responsive, making it feel like a real-time coding partner. Moreover, having the ability to organize multiple files in parallel provides a seamless experience.”

– Claude AI Assessment, Amir S, Tech Lead and Technical Architect.

Q6. Why do individuals like ChatGPT? 

Individuals like ChatGPT for its picture creation and analysis capabilities. Right here’s what 
Shilpi, a G2’s validated reviewer, says about ChatGPT: 

“It is easy to make use of, and responses are quick. I take advantage of it lots in my each day duties as a result of it could actually produce good-quality pictures, which I take advantage of in my PowerPoint. It is also net and API pleasant. I additionally use it for code era and debugging, so I can say the combination is comparatively simple. Total, I discovered it very straightforward and user-friendly.

– ChatGPT Assessment, Shilpi M, Embedded Software program Engineer.

Q7. Is Claude higher than ChatGPT?

It is dependent upon your wants. Claude excels at summarization, enhancing, and dealing with lengthy context home windows, whereas ChatGPT is extra versatile with built-in picture era, searching, and broader integrations.

Q8. Which is healthier for coding: Claude or ChatGPT?

• Claude: Excels in reasoning, code clarification, and debugging walkthroughs. Nice for studying whereas coding.
• ChatGPT: Sturdy in code era, integrations with IDEs, and multimodal help (e.g., explaining code by way of screenshots).

Q9. Which AI assistant has higher reasoning capabilities?

Claude is commonly praised for structured reasoning and summarization, particularly with longer contexts. ChatGPT additionally performs effectively however is extra targeted on versatility and creativity throughout duties.

Q10. Which is extra artistic, Claude or ChatGPT?

• Claude: Higher at considerate, nuanced writing and long-form enhancing.
• ChatGPT: Stronger in artistic era (pictures, tales, advertising copy) as a consequence of multimodal instruments.

Q11. Can Claude deal with longer contexts than ChatGPT?

Sure. Claude is designed for very massive context home windows, making it best for analyzing prolonged paperwork or conversations. ChatGPT has massive context help too, however Claude sometimes leads on this space.

Q12. Is Claude sooner than ChatGPT at producing responses?

Each are quick, however ChatGPT usually feels snappier because of OpenAI’s infrastructure and multimodal optimizations. Claude can generally take longer with massive, complicated prompts.

Q12. How does Claude evaluate to ChatGPT when it comes to accuracy?

• Claude: Stronger in cautious reasoning, doc evaluation, and avoiding hallucinations in structured duties.
• ChatGPT: Correct in lots of domains however could prioritize velocity and fluency, which may generally introduce errors.

Q13. What can ChatGPT try this Claude can’t?

• Constructed-in picture era
• Net searching for up-to-date info
• Voice and imaginative and prescient modes

Q14. What are the use instances the place Claude outperforms ChatGPT?

• Summarizing or enhancing very lengthy paperwork
• Offering step-by-step code explanations
• Supporting parallel file group and workflows

Q15. Which is healthier, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude?

Every has strengths: ChatGPT gives probably the most options and integrations, Gemini focuses on tight integration with Google’s ecosystem, and Claude makes a speciality of long-form reasoning and doc evaluation.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: My closing verdict

Though I discovered Claude to be higher at writing, rephrasing, and code era, I’ve second ideas about its reliability. Its responses in my testing of analysis and picture era options make me query its accuracy in different use instances as effectively. 

ChatGPT did a good job for me when it got here to analysis and picture era, particularly when it comes to accuracy. This elevated the reliability of the AI chatbot answer. It has its limits on the Free and Plus plans. Nonetheless, I’d wish to check different alternate options earlier than onboarding a brand new AI sidekick. 

If you wish to evaluate ChatGPT with different alternate options, take a look at my colleague Soundarya’s weblog on Gemini vs. ChatGPT. 

This text was revealed in Might 2025 and has been up to date with new info.