Gemini vs. Copilot: Which AI Assistant Delivers?

I by no means deliberate to run a head-to-head check between Gemini and Copilot. I simply wished to get my work completed. However over the previous few months, I discovered myself toggling between the 2 extra typically than I anticipated. 

At some point, I used to be drafting content material in Google Docs with Gemini’s assist, and the following, I used to be asking Copilot to scrub up a messy spreadsheet. Someplace alongside the way in which, I began noticing patterns. What began as comfort shortly was comparability: Gemini vs. Copilot.

So I made a decision to make it official. 

I ran each Gemini and Copilot by a sequence of real-world duties that matter to me: writing weblog posts, summarizing articles, producing pictures, analyzing PDFs and charts — the works. I wished to see which device held up higher throughout inventive, technical, and research-heavy jobs. 

And since efficiency might be subjective, I didn’t cease there. I dug by a whole bunch of G2 opinions to see how different customers fee their expertise. For those who’re questioning which AI chatbot really delivers, listed here are the solutions. 

TL;DR: Gemini is finest for content material creators, researchers, and entrepreneurs in Google Workspace, now with Agent Mode, Storybook, and Guided Studying. Copilot, alternatively, fits enterprise professionals, builders, and Microsoft 365 customers, with new multi-agent automation, Copilot 3D, and deeper Groups integration. Gemini delivers real-time analysis, broad file dealing with, and inventive polish, whereas Copilot excels at structured writing, coding, and productiveness inside Workplace apps.

Gemini vs. Copilot: At a look

Right here’s a fast function comparability of each AI fashions.

Function
Gemini (Google)
Copilot (Microsoft + OpenAI)

G2 ranking
4.4/5
4.8/5

AI fashions
Free: Gemini 1.5 Flash & Gemini 2.5 Flash
Paid: Gemini 1.5 Professional, 
Gemini 2.5 Flash & 2.5 Professional (Deep Suppose mode)
Free: GPT‑4 Turbo (restricted use)
Paid: GPT‑4 (by way of Copilot Professional),
GPT-5 with Sensible Mode (switches between velocity and deep reasoning)

Greatest for
Actual-time internet analysis, picture duties, integration with Google Workspace
Productiveness in Microsoft apps, inventive writing, and content material creation

Inventive writing means 
Good storytelling, extra structured and fact-driven; barely much less expressive
Extremely expressive, nuanced tone management, stronger at producing imaginative textual content

Picture technology and evaluation
Limitless picture technology, superior OCR, picture captioning
Restricted picture technology by way of DALL·E, fundamental picture evaluation (Copilot Professional required)

Actual-time internet entry
Sure by way of Google Search with quick, dependable entry
Sure by way of Bing search, generally slower or overly filtered

Coding and debugging
Able to easy code technology and clarification
One of many prime coding assistants (VS Code, GitHub Copilot integration)

Productiveness integration 
Seamless with Google Docs, Sheets, Gmail, Calendar, and Drive
Deep integration with Microsoft Phrase, Excel, Outlook, Groups, and PowerPoint

File dealing with and evaluation
Robust in summarizing PDFs, analyzing slide decks, Google-format recordsdata
Robust in summarizing Phrase, Excel, PowerPoint recordsdata, with plug-in help

Person expertise (UI/UX)
Clear, quick interface for Google customers
Extra different relying on context (Copilot in Edge vs. Workplace vs. VS Code)

Pricing 
Gemini Superior: $19.99/month (2 months free)
Microsoft Copilot Professional: $20/month (requires Microsoft 365 subscription)

Word: Each Google and Microsoft steadily roll out new updates to those AI chatbots. The main points beneath replicate probably the most present capabilities as of August 2025, however could change over time.

Gemini vs. Copilot: What’s completely different and what’s not?

Earlier than diving into hands-on exams, it’s value stepping again to take a look at what every device brings to the desk. Each Gemini and Copilot promise to make work simpler, quicker, and extra environment friendly, however they go about it in very alternative ways. Let’s break down what units them aside.

Gemini vs. Copilot: Key variations

Let’s check out the important thing variations that form the general expertise utilizing Gemini and Copilot:

• AI fashions and core engines: Gemini now runs on the Gemini 2.5 household — Gemini 2.5 Flash (free) and Gemini 2.5 Professional (paid). Each fashions are multimodal by design, which means they natively help enter varieties like textual content, pictures, PDFs, spreadsheets, and even video and audio. Gemini’s newest 2.5 Professional and Flash fashions introduce “Deep Think mode”, enabling multi-path reasoning for extra complicated issues. In distinction, Copilot is powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo (free tier) and GPT-4 (by way of Copilot Professional). Whereas Gemini emphasizes broader modality and content material versatility, Copilot is fine-tuned for structured productiveness inside Microsoft apps and developer environments. Copilot now runs on GPT-5 with a brand new Sensible Mode that mechanically switches between speed-focused and deep-reasoning fashions. 
• Context window: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Professional every help as much as 1 million tokens, which allows prolonged conversations, massive doc evaluation, and deep context retention. (Word: the earlier 2 million token help utilized solely to Gemini 1.5 Professional in its experimental section.) Copilot with GPT-4 Turbo helps a 128K token context window, which remains to be sizable however narrower in scope in comparison with Gemini — particularly for long-form duties and multi-file workflows.
• File dealing with and modal inputs: Gemini accepted each file format I threw at it, whether or not it’s PDFs, DOCXs, PPTXs, pictures, even spreadsheets with embedded charts. It additionally allowed me to add as much as 10 recordsdata concurrently, every as much as 100MB. It analyzed content material throughout them cohesively, even when the context was unfold out. Copilot in Microsoft 365 handles Phrase, Excel, and PowerPoint paperwork nicely, however multi-file uploads, pictures, and PDFs felt much less intuitive except I used them inside particular apps. Copilot in Edge and Bing has limitations with regards to dealing with combined content material or multitasking throughout file varieties.
• Information cutoff: As of Might 2025, Gemini 1.5 Professional has a January 2025 cutoff. Gemini 1.5 Flash is as much as June 2024. Copilot with GPT-4 can be listed as April 2023 to October 2023, relying on utilization context. Which means Gemini may need info on newer occasions. 
• Integration ecosystem: Right here’s the place every AI actually performs to its dwelling turf. Gemini integrates fantastically with Google Workspace — Docs, Sheets, Gmail, Calendar, and Drive. You possibly can invoke Gemini immediately inside paperwork or emails to rewrite, summarize, or plan. Copilot thrives in Microsoft 365 apps like Phrase, Excel, Outlook, Groups, and PowerPoint. It’s deeply context-aware, in a position to purpose based mostly on the content material of a doc or e-mail thread and act accordingly. Gemini’s “Live” voice mode connects with Google Calendar, Maps, and Duties, permitting hands-free scheduling, route planning, and reminders. Copilot introduces multi-agent orchestration for coordinated process dealing with throughout Microsoft 365 and customized brokers inbuilt Copilot Studio.

Gemini vs. Copilot: Key similarities 

Regardless of their variations, these AI chatbots have lots in widespread, and it’s sort of wild how succesful they’re:

• Pure language capabilities: Each instruments generate clear, readable textual content for weblog posts, emails, social content material, and extra.
• Coding help: You possibly can write, debug, and clarify code in a number of languages (Python, JavaScript, SQL, and many others.)
• Voice enter and interplay: Each supply voice capabilities. That is tremendous useful for those who choose talking prompts as a substitute of typing.
• Multimodal enter: Each help textual content and picture inputs. Gemini provides help for video and audio, whereas Copilot sticks to less complicated image-based recognition.
• Net search and factual queries: Actual-time internet search is obtainable in each, powered by Google (Gemini) and Bing (Copilot). 
• File summarization: Add a doc and get a bullet-point abstract. Each instruments do that nicely, although Gemini handles extra codecs.
• Customized AI brokers: You possibly can construct specialised assistants in each. Gemini calls them Gems, whereas Copilot faucets into Customized GPTs by way of OpenAI integrations.

Each instruments are highly effective, however not similar. One is a analysis assistant that lives in your Google Suite. The opposite is a productiveness companion wired into Excel, Groups, and your dev instruments. Understanding their core strengths and platform loyalties is vital earlier than diving into the head-to-head challenges.

Let’s see how they carry out when really put to the check.

How I in contrast Gemini and Copilot: My prompts and analysis standards

To present every AI its finest shot, I ran each instruments by a set of seven sensible, on a regular basis duties. 

• Textual content-based duties: Summarization, inventive writing, and content material technology
• Coding prompts: Fundamental coding challenges, code clarification, code output 
• Multimodal duties: File interpretation, picture inputs, information evaluation, and visible picture technology
• Actual-time analysis: Actual-time fact-finding and producing in-depth analysis summaries

I stored issues truthful by utilizing the very same prompts for each instruments. No rewording, no particular remedy. Simply side-by-side solutions to the identical questions. Wish to take them for a spin your self? You’ll find my check prompts right here.

 

I evaluated the response based mostly on: 

• Accuracy: Did the response ship factual, related, and reliable info?
• Creativity: Was the output unique, well-organized, and thoughtfully written?
• Effectivity: Was the response straightforward to observe, well-structured, and free from pointless filler?
• Usability: May I take advantage of the output as-is, or did it require vital revision to be useful?

So as to add different person views, I additionally cross-checked my findings with G2 opinions to see how different customers expertise these fashions.

Disclaimer: AI responses could differ based mostly on phrasing, session historical past, and system updates for a similar prompts. These outcomes replicate the fashions’ capabilities on the time of testing. 

Gemini vs. Copilot: How they really carried out in my exams

How did Gemini and Copilot really stack up when put to the check? For every process, I’ll stroll you thru the outcomes utilizing this format:

• What stood out: The wins, the misses, and any curveballs that stunned me alongside the way in which
• Who nailed it: Which AI carried out higher based mostly on accuracy, creativity, readability, and the way usable the output was
• Last verdict: My no-fluff opinion on which device I’d choose for that particular process

Let’s get into it.

1. Summarization 

I began with one thing deceptively easy: summarization. I handed each Gemini and Copilot an article from G2 that explores Canva’s rising adoption by non-designers. Their job? Flip it into three tight bullet factors, below 50 phrases, whereas conserving the core message intact.

Immediately, I observed a distinction in how each instruments approached the duty. Gemini stored issues clear and direct. The bullets have been quick, skimmable, and stayed true to the transient. 

I observed that Gemini’s reply met the necessities, conserving the phrase depend beneath 50. It was environment friendly and reusable. However whereas the output was tidy, it lacked specificity. There was no point out of real-world personas like educators or small companies. The takeaways felt generic, like they might’ve utilized to any SaaS device.  

Copilot, alternatively, stepped up. It delivered a well-structured abstract and added extra element and depth. It felt extra like a mini editorial than a TL; DR. 

So, who did it higher? Truthfully, it will depend on what you worth extra. For those who’re scoring based mostly on worth to the reader, or based mostly on strictly sticking to the immediate (3 bullets below 50 phrases)?

Personally, I felt each instruments adopted the immediate nicely. Copilot’s reply had particular personas (lecturers, HR, nonprofits), concrete use circumstances (lesson plans, recruitment supplies), and significant tendencies (e.g., rise in schooling use). 

Verdict: Copilot 

2. Content material creation 

Gemini covers all of the required factors within the product description: options, advantages, and viewers are clearly addressed. I felt that the language was polished, elegant, and on-brand. The outcomes have been well-formatted and damaged into scannable, usable chunks. I particularly preferred the way in which the TikTok and YouTube scripts have been formatted, with a transparent define of the scene and a voice-over to go together with it.  

Now let’s speak about Copilot’s reply. Identical to Gemini, it coated all of the options precisely. I cherished the tagline! It appeared stronger and extra brandable. The TikTok script is strong however a bit too simple and fewer visible (it lacked the creativity I used to be searching for.)

The structure is clear, clear, and appropriately tailor-made per platform. I felt the YouTube Advert was useful, however lacked the emotional storytelling punch of Gemini’s. Total, it felt extra product-focused than lifestyle-focused, which may be good for some contexts, however might have tweaking relying on model tone.

Gemini edges out Copilot because of stronger storytelling, platform nuance, and polish. Its content material feels prepared for launch with minimal edits. Nevertheless, Copilot’s tagline is best, and its content material could resonate extra in direct-to-consumer or product-driven copy.

Verdict: Cut up; Gemini for inventive social content material; Copilot for formal/structured content material.

3. Inventive writing 

I’ll admit it, I had quite a lot of enjoyable with this one. 

To check how nicely Gemini and Copilot may deal with inventive writing, I threw them each a sci-fi immediate. That they had 300 phrases to work with. The foundations? It needed to embody a lonely explorer chasing a mysterious sign, a sentient AI named Echo, and a derelict ship known as The Wanderer. 

I wished to know who delivered a greater quick story, not simply an AI-generated guidelines.  

Gemini precisely adopted the immediate, it had all of the talked about particulars, and there was an awesome setup with a philosophical twist. It additionally adopted a clear arc: intro → thriller → reveal. No wasted sentences; elegant transitions and tight focus. The story felt splendid for flash fiction anthologies or sci-fi blogs.

Copilot got here tremendous shut. It adopted all the important thing pointers aside from mentioning the spaceship’s identify. The Wanderer was implied within the title however not explicitly used within the story. It adopted a extra poetic tone; there was barely much less setup than Gemini, however the story nonetheless delivers affect. I really feel it could work nicely in a speculative fiction zine. The one minor tweak I’d have cherished could be if Copilot made it clear to the viewers what The Wanderer really is.  

Gemini delivers a narrative that’s wealthy, atmospheric, and totally compliant with the immediate. Copilot’s ending is arguably emotionally highly effective and poetic, however the story loses some technical factors for not explicitly referencing The Wanderer and having a barely looser construction.

Each are sturdy, however for those who’re evaluating based mostly on inventive precision and immediate constancy, Gemini takes the lead right here.

Verdict: Gemini  

4. Coding 

I’m not a developer, however I do know sufficient to acknowledge when code works or doesn’t. Coding is among the most typical AI use circumstances, particularly for entrepreneurs, creators, and non-devs like me who want fast, useful options. For this process, I requested Gemini and Copilot to create a password generator utilizing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The aim? A clear interface, well-structured code, and one thing I may run with out further debugging. 

Gemini actually went all in. It produced a elegant, visually interesting app powered by Tailwind CSS, full with interactive buttons, responsive styling, accessibility options, and clean animations. It even generated a password mechanically on web page load and included helpful UX suggestions like copy-to-clipboard confirmations. 

It felt production-ready. I cherished the preview and a spotlight to element. 

Copilot, alternatively, gave me a extra minimal setup. Fundamental HTML, easy inline CSS, and a separate JS file. Whereas it labored (and was simpler to observe for inexperienced persons), it lacked the visible polish and deeper logic that Gemini launched. There have been no accessibility enhancements, real-time suggestions, or styling finesse.

 For those who’re constructing one thing fast and clear for private use, Copilot’s model will get the job completed. However for those who’re searching for polish, considerate UX, and additional performance baked proper in, Gemini leads this spherical. It felt extra like a developer’s submission than a fundamental code assistant. 

Verdict: Gemini 

Which AI code generator ranks highest in accordance with G2 Opinions? My colleague tried the Greatest AI Code Turbines so you do not have to. 

5. Picture technology 

For my subsequent process, I wished Gemini and Copilot to create a visible picture. We’ve all seen AI-generated artwork floating round on-line, however can the instruments deal with one thing real looking and follow a immediate?

Right here’s what I requested each instruments to do: Create an expert inventory picture of a feminine bookstore proprietor inside a contemporary cafe plus bookstore. Embrace wood cabinets, cozy lighting, vegetation, and a small canine curled up close to the counter. 

Each instruments had been crushing their duties up thus far, and I used to be curious to see if that might proceed. Gemini delivered a vivid, open inside with a visual mix of bookshelves, seating, and décor. The picture showcases a transparent steadiness between cozy and trendy, and it nails the bookstore plus café hybrid look. It seems to be polished however barely staged.  

In terms of the picture generated by Copilot, there are tall wood bookshelves full of books and an espresso machine within the background. It does contact upon the café vibe, however focuses extra on the intimate, indie bookstore aesthetic. I preferred the textures of the wooden, books, and lighting. The bookstore-first picture seems to be calm, ambient, however lacks the greenery I requested within the immediate. 

And when it got here to picture technology velocity, Gemini took the lead.

In case your precedence is heat, storytelling, and an intimate indie bookstore really feel, then Copilot’s picture could be very sturdy, particularly with the topic’s grounded expression and the subdued ambiance. For those who want one thing that feels extra industrial, open, and dynamic, Gemini’s picture doubtless suits higher for inventory or advertising and marketing use (e.g., a touchdown web page for a contemporary bookstore café).  

Verdict: Gemini 

6. File evaluation 

For this process, I uploaded a PDF by The U.S. Surgeon Basic’s Advisory “Social Media Use and Mental Health” and requested each chatbots to summarize the important thing findings in 5 bullet factors, below 100 phrases. 

Gemini delivered 5 bullet factors that centered clearly on the examine’s construction: figuring out the goal teams (Millennials vs. Gen Z), outlining the strategies (self-report surveys on psychological well being indicators), and highlighting main findings. Its tone was simple, and it included nuanced observations, similar to noting that no single platform was strongly tied to worse outcomes. 

Copilot took a barely extra polished and editorial tone. Whereas it didn’t current the abstract strictly as bullet factors, it provided 5 digestible takeaways formatted like labeled sections: key discovering, strategies, outcomes, conclusion, and implications. This method made it really feel extra article-ready and framed the content material with readability and stream. It additionally emphasised the sensible utility of the analysis, suggesting instructions for future examine.

Gemini was direct, clear, and data-oriented. Copilot was editorial, structured, and barely extra polished. I really feel that Copilot deserves the sting right here, nevertheless it will depend on your wants and preferences. Though I have never examined it but, Copilot’s GPT-5 Sensible Mode is alleged to additional increase its analytical capabilities, particularly for enterprise doc processing. 

Verdict: Copilot 

7. Actual-time internet search 

Gemini delivered three tales that have been well timed and numerous, protecting developments from OpenAI, Perplexity, and Google. Its formatting was clear and constant, with clear headlines and concise summaries. 

Copilot surfaced equally present tales however took a barely completely different angle. It additionally cited the OpenAI tremendous assistant growth, however as a substitute of Perplexity’s Labs device, it included a Gmail integration replace from Google and a broader, extra cautionary story on deepfake video scams.  

These selections replicate Copilot’s tendency to tug from each product-centric and societal affect angles of AI. Nevertheless, Copilot’s formatting was much less structured: headlines, summaries, and dates have been bunched collectively, making the output really feel rather less scannable.

Each chatbots pulled legit, up-to-date data. However Gemini had the sting in readability and formatting, which makes an enormous distinction for those who’re engaged on a time-sensitive report or simply desire a quick learn.

Verdict: Gemini 

Right here’s a desk displaying which chatbot received the duties.  

Process
Winner
Why it received

Summarization
Copilot 🏆
Adopted the immediate finest, with clear, skimmable bullets and a compact format.

Content material creation
Cut up 
Gemini for polished storytelling; Copilot for crisp, product-oriented content material.

Inventive writing 
Gemini 🏆
Hit each immediate element with a structured, participating sci-fi narrative.

Coding
Gemini 🏆
Delivered a elegant, interactive password generator with UX particulars inbuilt.

Picture technology
Gemini 🏆
Produced probably the most correct, stock-ready picture with all requested components.

File evaluation
Copilot 🏆
Extra structured and editorially polished abstract with labeled insights.

Actual-time internet search
Gemini 🏆
Clear format, credible sources, and quicker supply of contemporary information.

Key insights on Gemini vs. Copilot from G2 Information  

I checked out assessment information on G2 to search out strengths and adoption patterns for Gemini and Copilot. Here is what stood out: 

 Satisfaction scores

• Gemini excels in ease of use (90%), ease of setup (96%), and ease of doing enterprise (100%).
• Copilot ranks excessive in ease of use (95%), ease of setup (95%), and ease of doing enterprise (96%). 

Industries used

• Gemini dominates IT providers, advertising and marketing and promoting, pc software program, larger schooling, and actual property.
• Copilot has a powerful presence in advertising and marketing and promoting, accounting, consulting, monetary providers, and IT providers.

Highest-rated options

• Gemini stands out within the high quality of responses (90%), transparency and explainability (88%), and effectivity in multi-turn conversations (88%).
• Copilot excels in prompt messaging (91%), file request (90%), and suggestions (89%).

Lowest-rated options

• Gemini struggles with customization flexibility (80%), bias mitigation (80%), and high quality of documentation (81%).
• Copilot struggles with cell utility (68%), time monitoring (72%), and versioning (79%). 

Continuously requested questions on Gemini vs. Copilot 

Have extra questions? Discover extra solutions beneath.

Q1. Gemini vs. Copilot: Which is best? 

Q2. Which AI assistant is best for writing and content material creation?  

Each instruments can write nicely, however Gemini tends to be extra concise and fact-driven, whereas Copilot (utilizing GPT-4) provides extra expressive, inventive writing with nuanced tone management. If storytelling or tone matching is vital, Copilot may need the sting.

Q3. Do Gemini and Copilot help picture enter and technology? 

Sure, however with variations. Gemini helps limitless picture technology, OCR, and visible captioning natively (Professional solely). Copilot makes use of DALL·E for picture technology and now provides Copilot 3D for creating 3D fashions from pictures, although it’s nonetheless experimental.

This autumn. Does Gemini or Copilot help voice interactions? 

Each help voice prompts. Gemini contains voice-based interactions throughout cell apps and internet, particularly when paired with Android and Google Assistant. Copilot additionally provides voice enter in some variations (like Copilot in Edge), nevertheless it’s much less fluid in Workplace environments.

Q5. Are Gemini and Copilot obtainable on cell?

Sure. Gemini is obtainable by way of the Gemini app (Android & iOS) and built-in into Android 14+ because the default assistant. Copilot has standalone apps and can be embedded in Microsoft’s cell variations of Phrase, Excel, and Edge.

Q6. Can I take advantage of each Gemini and Copilot?

Completely! Many customers mix each Copilot for brainstorming, writing, and structured coding whereas utilizing Gemini for analysis, doc evaluation, and multimodal duties. 

Q7. Which device handles bigger recordsdata and longer conversations higher? 

Gemini 1.5 Professional helps an enormous 2 million token context window, making it much better at retaining info throughout lengthy conversations or analyzing massive recordsdata. Copilot (GPT-4 Turbo) has a 128K token restrict — nonetheless strong, however not in the identical league for large-scale processing.

Q8. Can I take advantage of both AI inside Google or Microsoft apps?

Sure, however with limitations. Gemini is embedded into Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and Drive. Copilot is embedded in Phrase, Excel, Outlook, Groups, and PowerPoint. Every works finest inside its personal ecosystem.

Q9. Are these instruments free?

Each supply free tiers, however superior options are paid. Gemini Superior ($19.99/month) unlocks Gemini Professional options like Deep Suppose. Copilot Professional ($20/month + Microsoft 365 subscription) unlocks GPT-5 Sensible Mode, premium integrations, and superior Workplace performance.

Q10. What’s Gemini Agent Mode?

Agent Mode permits Gemini to deal with multi-step duties autonomously, like researching, summarizing, and organizing right into a doc, with out guide prompts at every step. 

Q11. What’s GPT-5 Sensible Mode in Copilot?

Sensible Mode mechanically chooses between a quicker, light-weight mannequin or a deeper reasoning mannequin, relying in your request.

Gemini vs. Copilot: My ultimate verdict  

After testing Gemini and Copilot on real-world duties similar to writing and summarization, picture technology, file evaluation, and real-time analysis, Gemini emerged because the extra constant all-rounder. It delivered polished, prompt-aligned leads to content material technology and coding and persistently nailed usability with its clear formatting and cohesive construction.

However Copilot held its floor.

Its file evaluation was extra editorial and reader-ready. It edged out Gemini in providing crisp, product-forward content material for structured advertising and marketing duties. And whereas it doesn’t match Gemini’s flexibility in multimodal duties or context size, Copilot shines contained in the Microsoft 365 suite, particularly for customers working closely in Phrase, Excel, and Outlook.

Backside line? It’s not about selecting only one.

Gemini is right for content material creators, entrepreneurs, and researchers who worth readability, polish, and broad file dealing with, particularly within the Google ecosystem. Copilot suits naturally into Microsoft workflows and excels at enterprise writing, structured documentation, and developer duties.

Use Gemini whenever you want structured, multimodal output at scale. Flip to Copilot when working inside Workplace apps or when tone-rich storytelling is the aim.

One of the best method is to mix each and construct your stack round what you do finest. 

Gemini and Copilot aren’t the one AI chatbots on the market. My coworker examined out Perplexity vs. ChatGPT. Test it out!

This text was initially printed in June 2025 and has been up to date with new info.