Make vs. Zapier: I Dragged and Zapped Till One Received Me Over

If you happen to’re trying to construct no-code or low-code automation, you might have stumbled upon Make and Zapier. Each are widespread in our Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) class, and whereas they could appear related at first look, they serve barely totally different consumer wants.Choosing the proper software issues as a result of it instantly impacts how effectively your crew can automate duties, scale workflows, and combine the instruments you already depend on. A mismatch in platform capabilities can imply wasted time, larger prices, or pointless complexity.

I’ve in contrast Make vs. Zapier intimately primarily based on totally different necessities, like consumer interface, flexibility, integrations, performance, and pricing. 

The correct selection is determined by what you worth most. In my evaluation, I discovered Make to be a most well-liked selection to be used circumstances involving sophisticated workflows. Zapier is extra appropriate to be used circumstances that want general-purpose automation. 

Make vs. Zapier: At a look

Right here’s a fast comparability of the favored iPaaS software program: 

 

Function
Make
Zapier

G2 score
4.7/5
4.5/5

Greatest for
Energy customers and complicated workflows
Rookies and general-purpose automation

Person interface (UI) and adaptability
Visible drag-and-drop canvas (very versatile)
Step-by-step type builder (easier)

Automation capabilities
Superior options like limitless steps/branches and information dealing with
Easy automations with mounted step limits

Scalability
Price-efficient at excessive quantity (10k+ ops/month)
Scales with enterprise-grade safety, limitless customers, and admin controls

Integrations
~2,400+ apps, with deeper API help
7,000+ apps

Assist & group
Robust group, good documentation, however fewer third-party tutorials
Bigger group, tons of guides/tutorials, and broader ecosystem help

Pricing
Free, as much as 1,000 ops/month. The pricing begins from $9/month for 10,000 ops
Free for 100 duties/month. The pricing begins from $19.99/month (multistep)

Word: The small print right here replicate essentially the most present capabilities as of August 2025. Each Make and Zapier proceed to evolve quickly, so options and pricing might change over time. 

Earlier than we discover Make and Zapier, let’s rapidly overview the variations and similarities between the 2 instruments. 

TL;DR: Make is highly effective, versatile, and cost-efficient — finest for energy customers, technical groups, and companies that must automate complicated workflows with branching logic, superior information dealing with, and excessive activity volumes. Zapier is less complicated, beginner-friendly, and integrates with 7,000+ apps, making it the go-to selection for fast, general-purpose automation with no steep studying curve. Make shines in pricing, scalability, and workflow depth, whereas Zapier dominates in app protection, ease of use, and enterprise-ready options. For complicated, budget-conscious automation, select Make. For easy, plug-and-play automation with most integrations, Zapier leads.

Make vs. Zapier: What’s totally different? 

Right here’s an outline of the important thing variations between the 2 software program. 

• Integration rely and depth: Zapier connects to way more apps — over 7,000 and counting. Whereas Make lists round 2,400, it affords many extra actions per app, for instance, 84 actions for Xero vs. 25 in Zapier.
• Workflow builder type: Zapier makes use of a linear, form-based builder with dropdowns and a step-by-step wizard, which makes it nice for freshmen. Make affords a visible drag-and-drop canvas. In apply, I discovered Zapier’s interface easier to start out with, whereas Make’s canvas felt extra pure and versatile as soon as I realized it.
• Automation complexity: Make handles complicated eventualities with limitless steps, routes, or branches, and highly effective information instruments like arrays, JSON parsing, and so on. Zapier automation (Zaps) is usually extra easy: They’re straightforward to construct however have mounted limits, e.g., a most of 100 steps, and fewer built-in information instruments.
• Pricing mannequin: Zapier costs by duties, the place every app motion is a activity on tiered plans, and now even affords pay-per-task billing. Make costs by operations, i.e., every module run. In my assessments, Make’s paid plans give way more operations for the worth — for instance, $9/mo for 10,000 operations vs. $19.99 for simply 750 Zapier duties. Make could be less expensive at scale, although the billing math could be complicated.

Make vs. Zapier: What’s related?

Each Make and Zapier ship options to create, check, and deploy automations with flexibility. There are a number of similarities you’ll be able to’t miss, for instance:

• Visible editors are intuitive, with ample pre-built templates that assist new customers get began. Neither software requires code to design fundamental automation for duties.
• Free tier choices is obtainable in each plans, with a paid plan for rising utilization. Make facilitates 1000 operations whereas Zapier caters to 100 duties within the free model.
• Person base for each iPaaS software program is equally robust and numerous. They cater to a variety of customers, from solo entrepreneurs to enterprise groups. The 2 software program have quantity of documentation, tutorials, and communities that customers can faucet for assist. 

How I in contrast Make and Zapier: My analysis standards

First, I checked out ease of use. This meant seeing how easy the interface and setup felt for somebody new, and how briskly I might construct a fundamental automation. Components like interface design, navigation, the provision of templates, tooltips, and onboarding guides helped tip the dimensions.

For my workflows, integrations, and most significantly, the depth of integrations was crucial. The depth of integration represents the provision of actions that I can carry out by the combination. For this, I examined how every platform handles app performance and whether or not there have been limitations or workarounds wanted.

I additionally thought-about help and group, and skimmed by every platform’s assist heart, boards, and help choices. This helped me see the provision of self-service by the platform’s information base.

For any shopping for course of, pricing transparency was an enormous issue. I verified that in my check and in contrast each choices to find out their cost-effectiveness. 

Disclaimer: These insights are primarily based on hands-on testing of Make and Zapier as of August 2025. Platform options, pricing, and performance might evolve over time. This overview displays particular person expertise and opinions on the time of analysis and doesn’t symbolize the official stance or endorsement of G2. For the newest updates, seek the advice of Make and Zapier instantly.

Make vs. Zapier: How they really carried out in my assessments

Let’s speak efficiency. I examined Make and Zapier to see what they do properly and the place they fall quick. Right here’s what I discovered.

Person interface and adaptability

In apply, utilizing every software highlighted their trade-offs. Zapier’s UI felt intuitive. It walks you thru triggers and actions with clear types. The platform was pretty easy to make use of and navigate, and Zapier Copilot even supplied related ideas to help.

Then again, Make’s UI is a canvas of modules you drag and join. At first, it felt overwhelming, however quickly I appreciated having the ability to visually lay out a number of branches and see information circulation between steps. 

For complicated flows, Make’s editor gave me rather more management. I might add routers, loops, and information transformations on the fly. I’d say Zapier wins if simplicity is your purpose, however Make pulls forward on flexibility. 

As an influence consumer, I gave a slight edge to Make due to that flexibility and visible readability.

Winner: Make

App integrations

After I in contrast integrations, the numbers advised one story: Zapier has extra apps. In testing, each app I wished, for instance, Salesforce, Mailchimp, Google Analytics, and so on., was on Zapier.

Just a few instruments I persistently use didn’t have a Make integration in any respect, so I needed to skip them or use a generic webhook as a workaround. What’s extra, Zapier has an AI apps part with 250+ integrations, which Make lacks.

The depth of Make’s integrations was spectacular. For instance, Make lets me pull detailed bill information from Xero with a number of fields, whereas Zapier solely has elementary bill triggers.

Ultimately, if app availability is your precedence, Zapier wins since its library is so clearly dominated by measurement and fast connectors.

Winner: Zapier 

Automation capabilities

To check performance, I constructed actual workflows of accelerating complexity. Easy duties, like posting type responses to a Slack channel, have been straightforward on each. For extra complicated wants like information parsing, loops, and multi-branch logic, Make supplied higher help. For instance, I created a situation in Make that collected information from a number of sources, processed it with filters and array capabilities, after which uploaded a formatted report, all with out writing code. 

Attempt doing that on a fundamental Zapier plan, and also you hit limits. Zapier capped my steps, and I needed to break the method into separate Zaps. 

I additionally examined conditional branching on both. Make let me splinter one workflow into many routes with out restrict, whereas Zapier pressured me into its “Paths” function, which is extra inflexible. 

General, Make dealt with my complicated assessments extra gracefully with limitless steps and built-in information instruments. Zapier was dependable, however much less expressive.

Winner: Make

Pricing

Pricing was an eye-opener. I took two actual use circumstances: a small venture with a number of hundred duties per 30 days and a bigger venture with tens of 1000’s of duties. Zapier’s free tier (100 duties) was limiting for the small venture. I wanted a paid plan at $19.99/mo to get extra duties. Make supplied 1,000 free ops; even its most cost-effective $9/mo plan gave 10,000 ops. 

For the bigger venture, Zapier’s $19.99 plan solely coated 2,000 duties, plus overage charges, whereas Make’s $16 or $29 plans coated 10,000 ops every. It gave me way more headroom. I did the maths: Zapier was roughly $0.026 per activity on their starter plan, whereas Make was about $0.0009 per operation. Nonetheless, Zapier’s newer “pay-per-task” billing permits you to add additional duties on demand, simplifying budgeting for fluctuating utilization.

Briefly, Make was way more cost-efficient for my check eventualities. The one warning is that Make’s operations can deplete rapidly in the event you design very huge eventualities; I had to concentrate to that. Nonetheless, for many customers on a funds, Make received the day.

Winner: Make

Right here’s a desk exhibiting the winner by way of totally different iPaaS software program options: 

Function
Winner
Why it received

Person interface and adaptability
Make 🏆
Visible canvas permits drag-and-drop workflows vs Zapier’s types. It gave extra inventive management.

App integrations
Zapier 🏆
Zapier has an enormous library of apps. It affords greater than 7,000 apps. Conversely, Make affords near 2400 apps.

Automation capabilities
Make 🏆
I bought limitless steps/branches and information instruments in Make. Conversely, Zapier had mounted limits. 

Pricing
Make 🏆
It is less expensive per motion. Cost 10k ops for $9. It is advisable pay rather more in Zapier’s case. 

Key insights on Make vs. Zapier from G2 information

I seemed into G2’s overview information to seek out strengths and adoption patterns for Make and Zapier. Right here’s what stands out: 

Satisfaction rankings

• Make has an honest ease of use (88%), ease of setup (85%), and ease of doing enterprise (94%) rankings.
• Zapier excels in ease of use (89%), ease of setup (88%), and ease of doing enterprise(90%).

Industries represented

• Make dominates advertising and promoting, laptop software program, IT companies, monetary companies, and accounting.
• Zapier has a powerful presence in advertising and promoting, laptop software program, IT companies, the web, and monetary companies.

Highest-rated options

• Make excels in pre-built connectors (91%), real-time integration (91%), and circulation designer (92%).
• Zapier stands out for flow-designer (90%), pre-built connectors (87%), and information encryption (89%). 

Lowest-rated options

• Make struggles with huge information processing (76%), digital information interchange (EDI) (77%), and useful resource definition (83%).
• Zapier struggles with utility programming interface (API) administration (82%), digital information interchange (EDI) (82%), and managed file switch (84%).

Ceaselessly requested questions on Make vs. Zapier from G2 information

Q1. Which platform is extra appropriate for a newbie: Make or Zapier?

Zapier is commonly higher for freshmen. Its step-by-step interface and plentiful tutorials make it very approachable. In my trials, I might create easy automations with out studying documentation. Make, with its drag-and-drop choices, has a steeper studying curve.

Q2. What can be a surefire dealbreaker when selecting between Make or Zapier?

 The most important dealbreakers are normally integrations and particular function wants. If one platform doesn’t help an app or motion you want, that forces your hand. For instance, in my comparability, Zapier had all 7,000+ main apps whereas Make was lacking a number of area of interest instruments I exploit. 

Q3. Which software is healthier for AI and new app integrations?

Zapier presently leads right here, providing 250+ AI app integrations and Zapier Copilot to suggest workflows. Make helps superior APIs and customized modules however doesn’t but have a devoted AI market.

This autumn. Can I migrate workflows from Zapier to Make (or vice versa)?

There’s no one-click migration. Nonetheless, each platforms help webhooks, APIs, and related triggers/actions. This implies workflows can normally be rebuilt, although complicated migrations might take time.

Q5. What industries favor Make vs. Zapier?

G2 overview information exhibits Make is widespread in advertising, IT companies, and monetary companies, the place complicated workflows are frequent. Due to its broad integrations, Zapier dominates in advertising, SaaS, and web companies.

Make vs. Zapier: The ultimate verdict

Finally, Zapier and Make are each strong automation platforms, however they cater to barely totally different wants. For somebody new to automation or with easy duties, I’d lean towards Zapier. Its interface is easy, and its large app library means you’ll nearly definitely discover any software you want. 

I might suggest Make you probably have complicated workflows, technical necessities like dealing with information arrays or calling APIs, or a decent funds at scale. In my assessments, its power-user options and decrease value per operation have been decisive.

Lastly, your resolution might be primarily based on what issues most to you. If you happen to want fast and straightforward automation and broad compatibility, go along with Zapier. Attempt Make in the event you want deep customization and wish to squeeze essentially the most out of your greenback. Each instruments are strong, so that you’ll have the ability to automate duties both manner. Decide the one which matches your priorities.

Discover different Zapier options and Make options in your iPaaS wants.

This text was initially printed in April 2025 and has been up to date with new info.