A thriller has been roiling longtime wearers of Dockers’ ubiquitous khaki males’s pants: Why are issues dropping out of individuals’s pockets once they sit down?
“My change and keys fall out sitting,” posted Robert C. about his Dockers Males’s Traditional Match khakis. “Excellent with major exception of front pocket depth,” wrote Upset Loyalist, who posted a one-star evaluate of a pair of pebble-brown Signature Traditional Match trousers. “These are actually 4-star pants,” clarified IWearPants in a web-based evaluate thread. “Unfortunately, they’ve committed the ultimate atrocity in fashion; they made the pockets too shallow.”
By IwearPants’ measurement, the pockets on his new Dockers are 1.5 inches much less deep than his outdated pair. And he made a plea: “If Dockers (or parent Levi Strauss) needs to raise the price by a couple of bucks per pair, so be it. Just give me back deep pants pockets on my Dockers.”
Levi Strauss is definitely not the mother or father firm of Dockers; in Could it offered the label to model possession big Genuine Manufacturers Group (ABG) for an preliminary worth of $311 million, with the potential to succeed in $391 million based mostly on efficiency beneath Genuine’s possession. (ABG declined to touch upon the Dockers model or its pocket measurements.)
The Dockers pocket predicament—which some dismiss as an imagined downside—predates ABG’s possession. Nevertheless it exhibits the peril of a 1.5-inch distinction—that razor’s edge between a loyal buyer and one who abandons a product or firm. Even probably the most beloved manufacturers can turn out to be weak following perceived adjustments or high quality erosion that upset passionate shoppers—and when heritage manufacturers are bought by holding corporations like ABG, which search to optimize and develop the manufacturers globally, that zeal could be a double-edged sword.
Some Dockers loyalists have complaints in regards to the model’s pockets.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Photos
Dockers adopted a well-trodden path, and one which many iconic manufacturers have taken in recent times. Model administration corporations together with ABG, WHP International, and Marquee Manufacturers have assembled portfolios that embody dozens of household-name manufacturers. These corporations have emerged as the brand new energy brokers in trend and retail, raking in some $50 billion in gross sales globally annually.
The cherished American retail names now owned by these corporations make a protracted record: WHP owns Toys “R” Us and Infants “R” Us, Anne Klein, Categorical, Bonobos, and Rag & Bone. Marquee owns the revamped Martha Stewart model, BCBG, Laura Ashley, and Isotoner. ABG, the biggest participant on this house, owns an enormous empire of greater than 50 manufacturers, together with Eddie Bauer, Champion, and Reebok.
Additionally beneath the ABG umbrella are investments within the identify, picture, and likeness rights of varied boldface names, together with soccer famous person David Beckham and basketball nice Shaquille O’Neal. ABG additionally owns the names and likenesses of long-deceased icons together with Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe, and Muhammad Ali.
A $1.4 billion deal for ABG to personal a controlling curiosity within the Guess? model is anticipated to shut in 2026 after a bidding warfare. If that deal goes via, Guess? can be among the many largest manufacturers within the ABG portfolio, and is anticipated to deliver its annual retail gross sales to $38 billion annually. WHP’s annual retail gross sales are $7 billion, and Marquee’s are $3 billion and climbing.
Globally, the broader model licensing trade is rising quickly—from $295 billion in 2024 to an anticipated virtually $400 billion in 2029. That features the brand-licensing arms inside blockbuster corporations reminiscent of Disney, which licenses its characters for toys and different merch, and the NFL, which licenses group jerseys. Rising client demand, star-powered celeb endorsements, and the expansion of digital branding, by which a model exists and sells to clients totally on-line with no bodily retail shops, have fueled this progress.
The query on the coronary heart of this thriving trade, which frequently consists of non-public fairness backers, is whether or not the second life these manufacturers get after being rescued from the brink of oblivion could be worthwhile with out sacrificing high quality. In some instances the born-again variations of those as soon as iconic manufacturers are smashing successes. In others, they will flip into zombie manufacturers, churning out inferior merchandise that depart shoppers feeling confused and even betrayed.
“Licensing can genuinely keep a brand alive when it’s losing momentum,” mentioned Armando Zuccali, CEO at non-public monetary providers agency Gag London Fairness Capital which companions with companies and working companions. “The risk is when it becomes the whole strategy and everyone starts chasing royalties and door count to hit numbers. That’s usually when the products being to slip, quietly at first.”
The model administration playbook
The core of this enterprise is a quantity play: The model administration corporations purchase IP that they imagine could possibly be bringing in additional income, with the fitting push. Consumers usually pay lip service to their accountable guardianship of beloved manufacturers, however there’s an inherent pressure within the proposition: If the technique is to re-popularize and optimize a model, the stress to supply rapidly, cheaply, and at large scale to maximise licensing income can result in what critics name “enshittification”—the gradual decline of high quality as manufacturers chase quantity over worth.
As a substitute of producing stuff itself, the trade depends upon an enormous community of “operating partners”—corporations that license the model and do the heavy lifting of manufacturing and promoting merchandise. The model administration corporations usually examine and approve the merchandise on the market, however the design, craftsmanship, and manufacturing are all dealt with by the working companions, defined Sonia Lapinksy, managing director in trend retail on the consulting agency AlixPartners.
Critics declare some model administration corporations provide little oversight whereas permitting working companions to slap logos on an enormous array of subpar merchandise. Typically, the working companions rent the identical designers and suppliers that labored with a model previous to its buy to take care of continuity, mentioned Lapinsky, however issues can creep in when working companions’ practices are unscrupulous, or they lower corners.
Zuccali of Gag London Fairness Capital, who has overseen retail amenities tasks in Europe, the Center East, and Africa, mentioned model DNA normally solely survives a licensing sale if the unique product groups preserve authority by approving materials, checking building, visiting factories, and pushing again when somebody suggests a shortcut. “If that stops happening, the brand becomes a logo anyone can rent,” he added.
Erik McGregor/LightRocket by way of Getty Photos
The step that usually generates skepticism is when model administration corporations take away creatives and founders who beforehand maintained strict management in all facets of manufacturing—strolling manufacturing strains around the globe to test the stitches per inch on a pair of pants, for example, or the inclusion of actual buttonholes on a swimsuit versus ornamental buttons.
“In theory, there should be some standards with these arrangements that maintain a level of quality,” mentioned Lapinsky. “Or else eventually the products won’t sell, and the brand managers won’t be able to collect the royalties.”
It’s a matter of balancing high quality with amount, defined Aaron Duncan, a former inventive director for world licensing at Playboy Enterprises and an affiliate professor and chair of worldwide trend administration at Trend Institute of Know-how. However when the working companions have wager on the model by guaranteeing a price to the IP homeowners, they generally “go rogue” to make sure their return on funding, he mentioned.
Duncan, who has led world technique and enterprise improvement for manufacturers together with Barbie and Sizzling Wheels, recalled one licensee who opened a shop-in-shop in Seoul for a special model he can’t identify as a result of a confidentiality settlement. He had not accredited the store, and it wasn’t the fitting aesthetic for the model, mentioned Duncan. Whereas most companions are sincere of their enterprise dealings, he mentioned, he additionally has had attire producers that secretly sub-licensed a model to different producers. By the point it was found, the unauthorized merchandise have been already on the market. “Most of the time, you’re not even finding out about it until someone goes shopping in a mall in the middle of nowhere and sees it,” mentioned Duncan. “That’s the danger.”
These revenue-generating measures can dilute the model, Duncan added. And if a companion has broken the model, it may be troublesome to get well its shine.
The nostalgia paradox
What’s driving shoppers again to beloved manufacturers of the previous within the first place? In accordance with model strategist Jean-Pierre Lacroix, nostalgia performs an enormous position, and that nostalgia is rooted in three impulses, significantly in youthful shoppers: Nervousness, and want for psychological escape; the seek for non-mainstream manufacturers; and the ability of influencers.
“The undercurrent is there’s a lot of anxiety in the marketplace right now, and people are looking for a way of escaping this anxiety,” mentioned Lacroix. “The wars, the tariffs, the instability of the marketplace, the lost jobs, AI—all these things are unsettling for people.”
Manufacturers from the previous can soothe, he mentioned, permitting anxious shoppers “to live in the past where it was a great life.” For Gen Z, who wasn’t even born when many of those manufacturers have been of their heyday, the enchantment is complicated: Influencers in search of to be distinctive are utilizing unboxing movies on YouTube and TikTok to showcase merchandise beloved by their dad and mom’ technology.
Clay Routledge, a social psychologist who focuses on nostalgia, wrote within the New York Occasions that some 60% of Gen Z want they may teleport to these pre-iPhone days—which might clarify why they’re chasing tangible offline experiences like vinyl data, picture albums, and board video games.
For example, Champion-branded trainers are again after they almost disappeared. They’re common as a result of they tick a few of these key bins, mentioned Lacroix—a model with out the ubiquity of Nike, a uniqueness that makes the wearer stand out, and the nostalgia issue that evokes higher high quality.
Champion invented the hoodie within the Nineteen Thirties, and engineered it for pro-athletes to face as much as repeated put on and tear, climate, and journey. Below ABG’s stewardship, Champion is on its entrance foot once more, with a brand new partnership to promote at Goal and a fashion-forward focus. Its merchandise are being marketed as high-quality and substantial—with a trademarked reverse weave to withstand shrinking.
The Martha Stewart second
Martha Stewart—a model that encompasses dwelling and backyard merchandise, content material, and its eponymous founder’s likeness—is now a part of the Marquee Manufacturers portfolio, and it exemplifies the nostalgia phenomenon. It additionally demonstrates how a model administration firm can leverage and optimize a cherished model by bringing it new followers and clients. The corporate relaunched Stewart’s seminal 1982 ebook Entertaining in November after noticing that it was promoting for tons of of {dollars} on eBay, mentioned Marquee CEO Heath Golden.
In a advertising and marketing blitz, Stewart—America’s first self-made feminine billionaire and a popular culture determine whose enchantment has endured for many years—has made the media rounds this fall, showing on the Immediately present to debate her ebook whereas cooking mushroom and Tuscan tomato soups for sweater-weather season. There are additionally collaborations: Followers should buy seven of the desserts from Stewart’s ebook at Crumbl Cookies shops.
“Martha Stewart is having a moment,” mentioned Mark Weber, a podcaster and former CEO of Calvin Klein, The Donna Karan Firm, PVH Corp, and LVMH. “She looks great, and she’s out there in front of the public and creating demand.”
However the guru of domesticity’s model additionally provides an illustration of what can go improper when a model is offered to new homeowners bent on fast optimization. Martha Stewart Residing Omnimedia went public in 1999, valued at $2 billion, and raked in almost $1 billion in annual retail gross sales within the late Nineteen Nineties and early 2000—then modified fingers a number of instances following that peak. In 2004, following Stewart’s five-month jail sentence associated to insider buying and selling expenses, the inventory cratered, ultimately shedding 70% of its worth. In 2015, model administration firm Sequential Manufacturers Group acquired Martha Stewart Residing Omnimedia for $353 million—a cut price at lower than a fifth of its peak valuation.
Below Sequential’s stewardship, the model failed get well its earlier cachet. Sequential went out of enterprise after chapter proceedings resulted in 2022, however a former government who spoke anonymously as a result of they nonetheless work within the trade mentioned the corporate made the error of making an attempt to saturating the retail market with Stewart’s model. “The company wanted Martha Stewart’s name on every single product category from picture frames to sneakers to face cream,” the chief mentioned. With a life-style model meant to evoke aspirational entertaining, that indiscriminate technique undermined the narrative of curated or particular merchandise, the veteran exec added.
In 2019, Marquee Manufacturers acquired Martha Stewart from Sequential at a good cheaper price, $215 million. However beneath Marquee, Stewart’s model seems to have thrived. By 2021, Stewart’s merchandise have been raking in roughly $900 million in mixed retail gross sales yearly, and have been in 70 million households. Forbesestimated Martha Stewart Kitchen, a cabinetry, counter tops, and shelving line, might hit $1 billion in retail gross sales this 12 months.
Golden informed Fortune that the corporate mines nostalgia, but it surely additionally invests closely in client information and updates merchandise and advertising and marketing for extra trendy tastes. “We love our 19 brands like we love our children,” mentioned Golden. Together with nostalgia, shoppers crave authenticity, and Martha Stewart has it in spades, he mentioned.
Plus, Stewart has a powerful social recreation, together with virtually 3 million followers on Instagram, the place Stewart posts what followers affectionately name “thirst trap” pics of herself, décor, and pictures from round her property, together with of garden-grown garlic and chrysanthemums.
Social media has fully modified the best way corporations create curiosity and demand. “We’re in the want business,” mentioned Weber. “We’re in the business of creating a craziness in you to go out and buy something new.”
The standard danger
Neil Saunders, a retail analyst and marketing consultant, mentioned it’s not simply within the rapid aftermath of an acquisition that issues, however how the model worth grows over its lifetime. Saunders pointed to Brooks Brothers, which was owned by ABG and is now beneath an ABG-backed three way partnership with J.C. Penney known as Catalyst Manufacturers, as a model that has handled some early stumbles it’s working to beat. Catalyst is the model licensee for Brooks Brothers within the U.S. and operates design, sourcing, e-commerce, and shops domestically.
Below ABG, Brooks Brothers launched some secondary, lower-priced clothes ranges known as “diffusion” strains, Saunders mentioned, however the garments have been “a little bit shabby.” For the nostalgia play to work, the merchandise nonetheless must be good and the value needs to be proper, mentioned Saunders. “No one will buy into a brand or buy products from a brand just because there’s an element of nostalgia,” he mentioned. (Catalyst has not responded on the document to a request for remark.)
The mechanisms of decline are refined however cumulative, and clients normally really feel it earlier than anybody inside an organization will admit it, mentioned Zuccali. “The leather seems thinner; a zipper catches; buttons look fine in photos but feel cheap in the hand,” he mentioned. “Once trust breaks there, it’s really hard to get back.”
Any type of high quality degradation can alienate a model’s most precious clients, mentioned Gabriella Santaniello, founder of brand name consultancy A Line Companions. And a few—particularly the wealthier older clients who’ve private allegiance to specific manufacturers—are troublesome to win again. “Gen X is the most likely to be disappointed in you if you’re a brand,” mentioned Santaniello. “And they’ll hold a grudge—it’s harder for them to move on.”
Whispers have already begun in regards to the destiny of former Hollywood darling Badgley Mischka. The night put on label was acquired for an undisclosed worth in April by a three way partnership between world model licensing firm Established Inc. and ACI Licensing, in a deal that noticed the namesake cofounders Mark Badgley and James Mischka exit the corporate after greater than twenty years.
Andy Cohan, co-CEO and co-founder of ACI, mentioned Badgley and Mischka’s departure gained’t change the model all that a lot. ”We’ve adopted and maintained their viewpoint and their model positioning on a go-forward foundation, with a purpose of taking the model and actually extending it.”
Dia Dipasupil/Getty Photos
However founder transitions just like the one at Badgley Mischka are all the time unsure, mentioned Zuccali. “Their brand has such a specific sense of proportion and movement that it’s hard to put into guidelines,” he mentioned. “But in a year, maybe 18 months, we’ll know whether the collections still have that recognizable handwriting, or if they start shifting toward something more generic. I’m hoping for the former.”
Positioned for progress
Model administration corporations are adamant that they’re evolving these manufacturers and setting them up for long-term success. Golden, CEO of Marquee, mentioned the expansion in licensing companies has occurred throughout the previous decade and collective quantity “will only grow from here.” The mannequin is acquisitive and aggressive sufficient for bidding wars over prized names, and Marquee will seemingly purchase a minimum of two to 3 manufacturers annually, he mentioned.
The fact, mentioned Golden, is that the fragmented, geopolitically complicated world right this moment makes it difficult for conventional model corporations and standalone manufacturers to scale globally. He added that even the strongest corporations are “looking to offload brands to us in an effort to extend their runway.”
Andy Dunn, co-founder of the menswear model Bonobos, mentioned he’s completely satisfied to see the model he created thriving beneath the model administration mannequin. Dunn and his companions first offered Bonobos to Walmart in 2017, then it was offered to WHP International in 2021. Dunn not has an possession stake within the firm, however serves as an advisor. He purchased a number of pairs of shorts whereas on a visit within the Midwest this month, he informed Fortune, and mentioned he was happy to see requirements have been maintained, and even improved. “I’m blown away by how much better the product has gotten,” mentioned Dunn. “The quality has only improved over the last five years.”
The distinction boils right down to continuity, Dunn mentioned, noting that WHP stored on some technical design workers who’ve been with Bonobos for greater than a decade. “Those factors around talent and heritage and investment, that can vary widely,” mentioned Dunn.
Dunn mentioned it has a sure irony—in the event you care in regards to the product, cash will observe however the issue comes whenever you solely care in regards to the cash. “Money has faces,” mentioned Dunn, quoting one among his mentors. “All money looks the same, but it’s different depending on who you take it from. In this brand management world, that’s true as well.”
Glenn McMahon, former CEO of the luxurious trend model St. John Knits and AG Denims who additionally held senior government roles at Giorgio Armani, Dolce & Gabbana, and different manufacturers, has watched the strain amongst manufacturers and model administration corporations play out for many years, and he says he thinks the trade is poised for brand spanking new life. “People used to say brand management companies are where brands go to die,” he mentioned. “That’s changed.”
